South American Indian vs Yakama Community Comparison

COMPARE

South American Indian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Yakama
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

South American Indians

Yakama

Average
Poor
4,820
SOCIAL INDEX
45.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
193rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,331
SOCIAL INDEX
10.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
315th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Yakama Integration in South American Indian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 12,522,130 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Yakama within South American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.943. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in South American Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.770% in Yakama. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 South American Indians corresponds to an increase of 769.9 Yakama.
South American Indian Integration in Yakama Communities

South American Indian vs Yakama Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($44,206 compared to $33,009, a difference of 33.9%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($96,497 compared to $76,226, a difference of 26.6%), and median family income ($103,624 compared to $83,932, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,979 compared to $54,321, a difference of 2.5%), wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 4.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($62,215 compared to $56,234, a difference of 10.6%).
South American Indian vs Yakama Income
Income MetricSouth American IndianYakama
Per Capita Income
Good
$44,206
Tragic
$33,009
Median Family Income
Good
$103,624
Tragic
$83,932
Median Household Income
Excellent
$87,446
Tragic
$72,225
Median Earnings
Good
$46,952
Tragic
$39,107
Median Male Earnings
Average
$54,508
Tragic
$45,002
Median Female Earnings
Good
$40,019
Tragic
$33,354
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Excellent
$52,979
Exceptional
$54,321
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Good
$96,497
Tragic
$76,226
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Good
$101,171
Tragic
$86,992
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Good
$62,215
Tragic
$56,234
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
24.7%
Exceptional
23.7%

South American Indian vs Yakama Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.9% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 80.3%), married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 68.1%), and family poverty (9.1% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 43.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.7% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 15.3%), single mother poverty (29.3% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 24.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.1% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 26.0%).
South American Indian vs Yakama Poverty
Poverty MetricSouth American IndianYakama
Poverty
Fair
12.7%
Tragic
16.7%
Families
Fair
9.1%
Tragic
13.1%
Males
Fair
11.5%
Tragic
15.3%
Females
Fair
13.7%
Tragic
18.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Average
20.1%
Tragic
25.3%
Females 25 to 34 years
Average
13.5%
Tragic
17.6%
Children Under 5 years
Average
17.4%
Tragic
23.1%
Children Under 16 years
Average
16.4%
Tragic
22.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Average
16.5%
Tragic
21.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Fair
16.8%
Tragic
22.6%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.1%
Tragic
15.9%
Single Females
Good
20.6%
Tragic
28.3%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.7%
Tragic
18.1%
Single Mothers
Average
29.3%
Tragic
36.4%
Married Couples
Fair
5.3%
Tragic
9.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Poor
11.4%
Tragic
14.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
18.3%
Receiving Food Stamps
Average
11.9%
Tragic
21.4%

South American Indian vs Yakama Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 124.5%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 89.8%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.6% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 75.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 9.5%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 18.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 19.4%).
South American Indian vs Yakama Unemployment
Unemployment MetricSouth American IndianYakama
Unemployment
Tragic
5.5%
Tragic
7.3%
Males
Tragic
5.5%
Tragic
7.9%
Females
Tragic
5.5%
Tragic
6.7%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.1%
Tragic
15.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
18.0%
Tragic
22.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.8%
Tragic
13.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Fair
6.8%
Tragic
8.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Fair
5.6%
Tragic
9.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Average
4.7%
Tragic
5.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.7%
Tragic
5.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
8.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Fair
4.9%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.5%
Tragic
6.6%
Seniors > 65
Poor
5.2%
Tragic
6.7%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.2%
Tragic
18.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
7.9%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Fair
9.0%
Tragic
9.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Fair
5.5%
Tragic
8.1%

South American Indian vs Yakama Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 7.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 0.28%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 3.2%).
South American Indian vs Yakama Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricSouth American IndianYakama
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.0%
Tragic
62.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Excellent
79.9%
Tragic
75.8%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Poor
35.8%
Good
36.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Good
75.3%
Average
75.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Fair
84.5%
Tragic
80.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Average
84.7%
Tragic
79.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Good
84.5%
Tragic
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
82.9%
Tragic
80.6%

South American Indian vs Yakama Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 86.0%), single mother households (6.4% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 30.8%), and births to unmarried women (31.7% compared to 40.3%, a difference of 27.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.0% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 1.8%), currently married (45.8% compared to 44.0%, a difference of 4.0%), and divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 4.4%).
South American Indian vs Yakama Family Structure
Family Structure MetricSouth American IndianYakama
Family Households
Excellent
64.6%
Exceptional
69.3%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Exceptional
30.8%
Married-couple Households
Fair
46.0%
Tragic
45.2%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.26
Exceptional
3.45
Single Father Households
Excellent
2.3%
Tragic
4.2%
Single Mother Households
Fair
6.4%
Tragic
8.4%
Currently Married
Poor
45.8%
Tragic
44.0%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.8%
Tragic
12.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Average
31.7%
Tragic
40.3%

South American Indian vs Yakama Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 106.5%), no vehicles in household (12.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 82.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 62.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.0% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 6.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 20.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 62.2%).
South American Indian vs Yakama Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricSouth American IndianYakama
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
6.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.0%
Exceptional
93.6%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
53.9%
Exceptional
64.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.1%
Exceptional
31.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Average
6.3%
Exceptional
12.9%

South American Indian vs Yakama Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (15.9% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 67.9%), bachelor's degree (39.3% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 60.7%), and no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 58.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.3%).
South American Indian vs Yakama Education Level
Education Level MetricSouth American IndianYakama
No Schooling Completed
Poor
2.2%
Tragic
3.6%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.8%
Tragic
96.6%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.8%
Tragic
96.6%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.7%
Tragic
96.5%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.7%
Tragic
96.4%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Tragic
95.9%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Tragic
95.2%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Tragic
94.8%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Tragic
94.3%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.5%
Tragic
91.7%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.1%
Tragic
91.2%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.3%
Tragic
90.1%
10th Grade
Tragic
93.1%
Tragic
86.9%
11th Grade
Tragic
92.0%
Tragic
85.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Poor
90.6%
Tragic
82.5%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.5%
Tragic
80.0%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.2%
Tragic
74.5%
College, Under 1 year
Average
65.5%
Tragic
52.6%
College, 1 year or more
Good
60.0%
Tragic
46.2%
Associate's Degree
Good
47.4%
Tragic
32.3%
Bachelor's Degree
Excellent
39.3%
Tragic
24.5%
Master's Degree
Excellent
15.9%
Tragic
9.5%
Professional Degree
Excellent
4.8%
Tragic
3.1%
Doctorate Degree
Excellent
2.0%
Tragic
1.3%

South American Indian vs Yakama Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 40.6%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 37.9%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.00%, a difference of 33.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 3.4%), disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 51.3%, a difference of 8.8%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 11.1%).
South American Indian vs Yakama Disability
Disability MetricSouth American IndianYakama
Disability
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
13.4%
Males
Excellent
10.9%
Tragic
13.5%
Females
Exceptional
11.8%
Tragic
13.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Exceptional
1.00%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Excellent
5.5%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Excellent
6.4%
Tragic
9.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Excellent
10.9%
Tragic
13.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
23.1%
Tragic
29.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Good
47.1%
Tragic
51.3%
Vision
Average
2.2%
Tragic
2.5%
Hearing
Excellent
2.9%
Tragic
3.9%
Cognitive
Poor
17.5%
Tragic
18.1%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.9%
Tragic
6.8%
Self-Care
Excellent
2.4%
Tragic
2.7%