White/Caucasian vs Yakama Community Comparison
COMPARE
White/Caucasian
Yakama
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Whites/Caucasians
Yakama
5,140
SOCIAL INDEX
48.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
185th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,331
SOCIAL INDEX
10.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
315th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Yakama Integration in White/Caucasian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 19,908,957 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Yakama within White/Caucasian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.392. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Whites/Caucasians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.010% in Yakama. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Whites/Caucasians corresponds to a decrease of 10.2 Yakama.
White/Caucasian vs Yakama Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($42,180 compared to $33,009, a difference of 27.8%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,668 compared to $76,226, a difference of 20.3%), and wage/income gap (28.5% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($58,847 compared to $56,234, a difference of 4.6%), householder income under 25 years ($50,336 compared to $54,321, a difference of 7.9%), and median female earnings ($37,531 compared to $33,354, a difference of 12.5%).
Income Metric | White/Caucasian | Yakama |
Per Capita Income | Poor $42,180 | Tragic $33,009 |
Median Family Income | Poor $99,800 | Tragic $83,932 |
Median Household Income | Poor $82,029 | Tragic $72,225 |
Median Earnings | Poor $45,197 | Tragic $39,107 |
Median Male Earnings | Fair $53,925 | Tragic $45,002 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $37,531 | Tragic $33,354 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $50,336 | Exceptional $54,321 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Poor $91,668 | Tragic $76,226 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Fair $98,091 | Tragic $86,992 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $58,847 | Tragic $56,234 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.5% | Exceptional 23.7% |
White/Caucasian vs Yakama Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.1% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 93.7%), married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 85.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 60.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.4% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 1.3%), single male poverty (14.5% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 10.0%), and single mother poverty (31.2% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 16.7%).
Poverty Metric | White/Caucasian | Yakama |
Poverty | Average 12.3% | Tragic 16.7% |
Families | Good 8.8% | Tragic 13.1% |
Males | Average 11.1% | Tragic 15.3% |
Females | Average 13.4% | Tragic 18.0% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 20.8% | Tragic 25.3% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 17.6% |
Children Under 5 years | Poor 18.1% | Tragic 23.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Average 16.2% | Tragic 22.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Average 16.5% | Tragic 21.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Average 16.6% | Tragic 22.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 14.5% | Tragic 15.9% |
Single Females | Tragic 22.7% | Tragic 28.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.4% | Tragic 18.1% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 31.2% | Tragic 36.4% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 9.0% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Tragic 14.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 18.3% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Excellent 11.1% | Tragic 21.4% |
White/Caucasian vs Yakama Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 89.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 83.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 71.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.6% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 2.6%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 21.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 22.5%).
Unemployment Metric | White/Caucasian | Yakama |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 7.3% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 7.9% |
Females | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 6.7% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 15.6% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.8% | Tragic 22.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Excellent 10.1% | Tragic 13.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Poor 6.9% | Tragic 8.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 5.7% | Tragic 9.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Good 4.6% | Tragic 5.6% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.7% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 8.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 6.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Average 5.4% | Tragic 6.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 6.7% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.1% | Tragic 18.4% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.4% | Exceptional 6.6% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.6% | Tragic 9.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Excellent 5.3% | Tragic 8.1% |
White/Caucasian vs Yakama Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.3% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 12.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.9% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 6.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.6% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.9% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 2.5%).
Labor Participation Metric | White/Caucasian | Yakama |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.6% | Tragic 62.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.5% | Tragic 75.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 41.3% | Good 36.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.9% | Average 75.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 84.2% | Tragic 80.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 83.9% | Tragic 79.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.6% | Tragic 79.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 80.6% |
White/Caucasian vs Yakama Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 75.1%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 37.7%), and births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 40.3%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 2.5%), family households (65.1% compared to 69.3%, a difference of 6.5%), and married-couple households (48.6% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 7.4%).
Family Structure Metric | White/Caucasian | Yakama |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.1% | Exceptional 69.3% |
Family Households with Children | Average 27.4% | Exceptional 30.8% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.6% | Tragic 45.2% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.14 | Exceptional 3.45 |
Single Father Households | Fair 2.4% | Tragic 4.2% |
Single Mother Households | Good 6.1% | Tragic 8.4% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.6% | Tragic 44.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.6% | Tragic 12.3% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Poor 33.3% | Tragic 40.3% |
White/Caucasian vs Yakama Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 75.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 37.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.8% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.1% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 0.50%), no vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 6.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.8% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 6.7%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | White/Caucasian | Yakama |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.0% | Exceptional 6.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 93.1% | Exceptional 93.6% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 60.8% | Exceptional 64.9% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.6% | Exceptional 31.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Exceptional 12.9% |
White/Caucasian vs Yakama Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 117.9%), master's degree (13.8% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 46.0%), and bachelor's degree (35.3% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 44.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.9%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 2.0%).
Education Level Metric | White/Caucasian | Yakama |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Tragic 3.6% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 96.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 96.6% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 96.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 96.4% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 95.9% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 95.2% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 94.8% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Tragic 94.3% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.0% | Tragic 91.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Tragic 91.2% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.8% | Tragic 90.1% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.7% | Tragic 86.9% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.3% | Tragic 85.0% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 91.8% | Tragic 82.5% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.1% | Tragic 80.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Good 86.2% | Tragic 74.5% |
College, Under 1 year | Poor 64.0% | Tragic 52.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 57.6% | Tragic 46.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 44.2% | Tragic 32.3% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 35.3% | Tragic 24.5% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 13.8% | Tragic 9.5% |
Professional Degree | Poor 4.1% | Tragic 3.1% |
Doctorate Degree | Fair 1.8% | Tragic 1.3% |
White/Caucasian vs Yakama Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.00%, a difference of 66.2%), disability age 65 to 74 (24.2% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 22.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (13.2% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 0.40%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and ambulatory disability (6.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 1.8%).
Disability Metric | White/Caucasian | Yakama |
Disability | Tragic 13.0% | Tragic 13.4% |
Males | Tragic 12.8% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Tragic 13.2% | Tragic 13.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Exceptional 1.00% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.6% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 12.6% | Tragic 13.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 24.2% | Tragic 29.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Average 47.3% | Tragic 51.3% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Tragic 2.5% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 3.9% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 17.0% | Tragic 18.1% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.7% | Tragic 6.8% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.7% |