New Zealander vs Yakama Community Comparison

COMPARE

New Zealander
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Yakama
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

New Zealanders

Yakama

Excellent
Poor
8,769
SOCIAL INDEX
85.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
50th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,331
SOCIAL INDEX
10.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
315th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Yakama Integration in New Zealander Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 11,209,300 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Yakama within New Zealander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.838. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in New Zealanders within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.417% in Yakama. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 New Zealanders corresponds to an increase of 417.1 Yakama.
New Zealander Integration in Yakama Communities

New Zealander vs Yakama Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,575 compared to $33,009, a difference of 53.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($105,085 compared to $76,226, a difference of 37.9%), and median family income ($115,230 compared to $83,932, a difference of 37.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,294 compared to $54,321, a difference of 1.9%), wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 16.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($67,333 compared to $56,234, a difference of 19.7%).
New Zealander vs Yakama Income
Income MetricNew ZealanderYakama
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$50,575
Tragic
$33,009
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$115,230
Tragic
$83,932
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$95,146
Tragic
$72,225
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$51,246
Tragic
$39,107
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$61,199
Tragic
$45,002
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$42,446
Tragic
$33,354
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,294
Exceptional
$54,321
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$105,085
Tragic
$76,226
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$111,286
Tragic
$86,992
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$67,333
Tragic
$56,234
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.7%
Exceptional
23.7%

New Zealander vs Yakama Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 115.9%), married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 101.5%), and family poverty (8.1% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 61.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.6% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 9.0%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.7% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 16.8%), and single male poverty (13.2% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 21.1%).
New Zealander vs Yakama Poverty
Poverty MetricNew ZealanderYakama
Poverty
Excellent
11.7%
Tragic
16.7%
Families
Exceptional
8.1%
Tragic
13.1%
Males
Excellent
10.8%
Tragic
15.3%
Females
Exceptional
12.7%
Tragic
18.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.7%
Tragic
25.3%
Females 25 to 34 years
Excellent
13.1%
Tragic
17.6%
Children Under 5 years
Good
16.6%
Tragic
23.1%
Children Under 16 years
Excellent
15.3%
Tragic
22.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Excellent
15.7%
Tragic
21.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Excellent
15.6%
Tragic
22.6%
Single Males
Poor
13.2%
Tragic
15.9%
Single Females
Average
21.0%
Tragic
28.3%
Single Fathers
Poor
16.6%
Tragic
18.1%
Single Mothers
Average
29.1%
Tragic
36.4%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
9.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
14.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.7%
Tragic
18.3%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.9%
Tragic
21.4%

New Zealander vs Yakama Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 126.8%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 91.7%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 83.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 8.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 15.6%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 21.3%).
New Zealander vs Yakama Unemployment
Unemployment MetricNew ZealanderYakama
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
7.3%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
7.9%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.7%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
15.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.8%
Tragic
22.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Tragic
13.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.0%
Tragic
8.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Excellent
5.3%
Tragic
9.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
8.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Tragic
6.6%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
6.7%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.1%
Tragic
18.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.2%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
9.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.3%
Tragic
8.1%

New Zealander vs Yakama Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 7.4%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 6.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 0.22%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.6% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 3.0%).
New Zealander vs Yakama Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricNew ZealanderYakama
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.7%
Tragic
62.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.7%
Tragic
75.8%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.0%
Good
36.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Good
75.2%
Average
75.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.0%
Tragic
80.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Excellent
85.0%
Tragic
79.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Poor
84.1%
Tragic
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Fair
82.6%
Tragic
80.6%

New Zealander vs Yakama Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 100.2%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 49.7%), and births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 40.3%, a difference of 32.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 3.9%), married-couple households (47.2% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 4.4%), and currently married (47.4% compared to 44.0%, a difference of 7.7%).
New Zealander vs Yakama Family Structure
Family Structure MetricNew ZealanderYakama
Family Households
Tragic
62.9%
Exceptional
69.3%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.1%
Exceptional
30.8%
Married-couple Households
Excellent
47.2%
Tragic
45.2%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.15
Exceptional
3.45
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
4.2%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
8.4%
Currently Married
Excellent
47.4%
Tragic
44.0%
Divorced or Separated
Excellent
11.9%
Tragic
12.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.3%
Tragic
40.3%

New Zealander vs Yakama Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 99.4%), no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 54.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 52.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 3.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 14.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 52.1%).
New Zealander vs Yakama Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricNew ZealanderYakama
No Vehicles Available
Good
10.2%
Exceptional
6.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Good
90.1%
Exceptional
93.6%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
56.7%
Exceptional
64.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.4%
Exceptional
31.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.5%
Exceptional
12.9%

New Zealander vs Yakama Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 112.6%), doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 95.2%), and professional degree (6.0% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 93.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.8%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.9%).
New Zealander vs Yakama Education Level
Education Level MetricNew ZealanderYakama
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Tragic
3.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
96.6%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
96.6%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
96.5%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.4%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
95.9%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
95.2%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
94.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Tragic
94.3%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Tragic
91.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Tragic
91.2%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.9%
Tragic
90.1%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.0%
Tragic
86.9%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.0%
Tragic
85.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.8%
Tragic
82.5%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.1%
Tragic
80.0%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.0%
Tragic
74.5%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
70.2%
Tragic
52.6%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.6%
Tragic
46.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
51.8%
Tragic
32.3%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
44.0%
Tragic
24.5%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
18.3%
Tragic
9.5%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.0%
Tragic
3.1%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.5%
Tragic
1.3%

New Zealander vs Yakama Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (22.9% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 29.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 28.1%), and hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 3.8%), disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 51.3%, a difference of 11.1%), and female disability (11.7% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 12.8%).
New Zealander vs Yakama Disability
Disability MetricNew ZealanderYakama
Disability
Excellent
11.5%
Tragic
13.4%
Males
Average
11.2%
Tragic
13.5%
Females
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
13.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Excellent
1.2%
Exceptional
1.00%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
9.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Good
11.0%
Tragic
13.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
22.9%
Tragic
29.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.2%
Tragic
51.3%
Vision
Excellent
2.1%
Tragic
2.5%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
3.9%
Cognitive
Fair
17.4%
Tragic
18.1%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
6.8%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
2.7%