Zimbabwean vs Yakama Community Comparison
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Yakama
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Zimbabweans
Yakama
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,331
SOCIAL INDEX
10.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
315th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Yakama Integration in Zimbabwean Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 6,825,750 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Yakama within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.848. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.249% in Yakama. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 1,249.3 Yakama.
Zimbabwean vs Yakama Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,804 compared to $33,009, a difference of 38.8%), median family income ($110,011 compared to $83,932, a difference of 31.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($98,586 compared to $76,226, a difference of 29.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $54,321, a difference of 6.0%), wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 10.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $56,234, a difference of 17.1%).
Income Metric | Zimbabwean | Yakama |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $45,804 | Tragic $33,009 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $110,011 | Tragic $83,932 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $90,618 | Tragic $72,225 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,229 | Tragic $39,107 |
Median Male Earnings | Excellent $56,302 | Tragic $45,002 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $40,798 | Tragic $33,354 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $51,259 | Exceptional $54,321 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $98,586 | Tragic $76,226 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $106,849 | Tragic $86,992 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $65,854 | Tragic $56,234 |
Wage/Income Gap | Fair 26.3% | Exceptional 23.7% |
Zimbabwean vs Yakama Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 125.9%), married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 119.6%), and family poverty (7.8% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 67.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.6% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 16.3%), single male poverty (13.1% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 21.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 24.1%).
Poverty Metric | Zimbabwean | Yakama |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 16.7% |
Families | Exceptional 7.8% | Tragic 13.1% |
Males | Exceptional 10.2% | Tragic 15.3% |
Females | Exceptional 12.3% | Tragic 18.0% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Fair 20.4% | Tragic 25.3% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.7% | Tragic 17.6% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.2% | Tragic 23.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.2% | Tragic 22.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.3% | Tragic 21.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.4% | Tragic 22.6% |
Single Males | Poor 13.1% | Tragic 15.9% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.5% | Tragic 28.3% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.6% | Tragic 18.1% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.9% | Tragic 36.4% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.1% | Tragic 9.0% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.6% | Tragic 14.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 18.3% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.5% | Tragic 21.4% |
Zimbabwean vs Yakama Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.2% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 111.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 111.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 101.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 10.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 10.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 14.5%).
Unemployment Metric | Zimbabwean | Yakama |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 7.3% |
Males | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 7.9% |
Females | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 6.7% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.2% | Tragic 15.6% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 15.4% | Tragic 22.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.2% | Tragic 13.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.4% | Tragic 8.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 9.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.6% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 5.7% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 8.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 6.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 6.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.6% | Tragic 6.7% |
Seniors > 75 | Average 8.7% | Tragic 18.4% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.3% | Exceptional 6.6% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 9.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 8.1% |
Zimbabwean vs Yakama Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 35-44 (86.1% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 9.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 8.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 0.73%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 4.9%).
Labor Participation Metric | Zimbabwean | Yakama |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 67.3% | Tragic 62.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 81.0% | Tragic 75.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.7% | Good 36.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Excellent 75.6% | Average 75.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Fair 84.5% | Tragic 80.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.6% | Tragic 79.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 86.1% | Tragic 79.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 84.0% | Tragic 80.6% |
Zimbabwean vs Yakama Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 89.3%), births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 40.3%, a difference of 40.6%), and single mother households (6.1% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 38.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.4% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 4.7%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 6.4%), and currently married (47.0% compared to 44.0%, a difference of 6.8%).
Family Structure Metric | Zimbabwean | Yakama |
Family Households | Fair 64.1% | Exceptional 69.3% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 27.9% | Exceptional 30.8% |
Married-couple Households | Excellent 47.4% | Tragic 45.2% |
Average Family Size | Poor 3.20 | Exceptional 3.45 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 4.2% |
Single Mother Households | Excellent 6.1% | Tragic 8.4% |
Currently Married | Good 47.0% | Tragic 44.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 12.3% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 28.7% | Tragic 40.3% |
Zimbabwean vs Yakama Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 100.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 52.9%), and no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 36.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 2.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 13.4%), and no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 36.7%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Zimbabwean | Yakama |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.0% | Exceptional 6.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.0% | Exceptional 93.6% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.2% | Exceptional 64.9% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 20.3% | Exceptional 31.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Good 6.4% | Exceptional 12.9% |
Zimbabwean vs Yakama Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 105.6%), master's degree (17.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 87.3%), and doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 77.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.7%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.7%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.8%).
Education Level Metric | Zimbabwean | Yakama |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Tragic 3.6% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 96.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 96.6% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 96.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 96.4% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 95.9% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 95.2% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Tragic 94.8% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Tragic 94.3% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.8% | Tragic 91.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.5% | Tragic 91.2% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.9% | Tragic 90.1% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.9% | Tragic 86.9% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.9% | Tragic 85.0% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.7% | Tragic 82.5% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.1% | Tragic 80.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.0% | Tragic 74.5% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 69.9% | Tragic 52.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 64.2% | Tragic 46.2% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 51.3% | Tragic 32.3% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 43.3% | Tragic 24.5% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 17.7% | Tragic 9.5% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 3.1% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 1.3% |
Zimbabwean vs Yakama Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 38.9%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 38.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 37.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 2.8%), disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 51.3%, a difference of 6.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 13.4%).
Disability Metric | Zimbabwean | Yakama |
Disability | Exceptional 10.9% | Tragic 13.4% |
Males | Exceptional 10.6% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 13.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.2% | Exceptional 1.00% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Good 5.5% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Good 6.5% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.4% | Tragic 13.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.5% | Tragic 29.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.1% | Tragic 51.3% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 2.5% |
Hearing | Excellent 2.8% | Tragic 3.9% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.6% | Tragic 18.1% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 6.8% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 2.7% |