Tsimshian vs Yakama Community Comparison
COMPARE
Tsimshian
Yakama
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Tsimshian
Yakama
4,927
SOCIAL INDEX
46.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
189th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,331
SOCIAL INDEX
10.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
315th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Yakama Integration in Tsimshian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 5,715,764 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Yakama within Tsimshian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.358. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tsimshian within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.152% in Yakama. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tsimshian corresponds to an increase of 152.0 Yakama.
Tsimshian vs Yakama Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,809 compared to $76,226, a difference of 28.3%), per capita income ($40,344 compared to $33,009, a difference of 22.2%), and median family income ($101,543 compared to $83,932, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (23.9% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 0.53%), householder income under 25 years ($54,649 compared to $54,321, a difference of 0.60%), and householder income over 65 years ($58,202 compared to $56,234, a difference of 3.5%).
Income Metric | Tsimshian | Yakama |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $40,344 | Tragic $33,009 |
Median Family Income | Fair $101,543 | Tragic $83,932 |
Median Household Income | Fair $83,346 | Tragic $72,225 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $43,695 | Tragic $39,107 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $48,836 | Tragic $45,002 |
Median Female Earnings | Average $39,530 | Tragic $33,354 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $54,649 | Exceptional $54,321 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Excellent $97,809 | Tragic $76,226 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Poor $96,783 | Tragic $86,992 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $58,202 | Tragic $56,234 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 23.9% | Exceptional 23.7% |
Tsimshian vs Yakama Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (11.5% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 96.7%), child poverty under the age of 5 (14.7% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 57.1%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.1% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 56.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.1% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 14.0%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.2% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 19.4%), and male poverty (12.8% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 19.5%).
Poverty Metric | Tsimshian | Yakama |
Poverty | Tragic 13.0% | Tragic 16.7% |
Families | Good 8.8% | Tragic 13.1% |
Males | Tragic 12.8% | Tragic 15.3% |
Females | Good 13.1% | Tragic 18.0% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 21.2% | Tragic 25.3% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.7% | Tragic 17.6% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.7% | Tragic 23.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.1% | Tragic 22.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Average 16.4% | Tragic 21.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.5% | Tragic 22.6% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.1% | Tragic 15.9% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.1% | Tragic 28.3% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 12.7% | Tragic 18.1% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 26.8% | Tragic 36.4% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 9.0% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.8% | Tragic 14.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 18.3% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 15.7% | Tragic 21.4% |
Tsimshian vs Yakama Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.5% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 74.8%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.2% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 72.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 47.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.30%), unemployment (7.2% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (16.5% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 5.8%).
Unemployment Metric | Tsimshian | Yakama |
Unemployment | Tragic 7.2% | Tragic 7.3% |
Males | Tragic 8.5% | Tragic 7.9% |
Females | Fair 5.4% | Tragic 6.7% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 16.5% | Tragic 15.6% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Good 17.3% | Tragic 22.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 18.0% | Tragic 13.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 8.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 13.8% | Tragic 9.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 5.6% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Good 4.5% | Tragic 5.7% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.2% | Tragic 8.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 6.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 6.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 6.7% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.5% | Tragic 18.4% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.6% | Exceptional 6.6% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 9.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Poor 5.6% | Tragic 8.1% |
Tsimshian vs Yakama Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (88.7% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 10.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 8.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (37.4% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.5% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 3.8%).
Labor Participation Metric | Tsimshian | Yakama |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.5% | Tragic 62.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.7% | Tragic 75.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Excellent 37.4% | Good 36.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 72.3% | Average 75.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 88.7% | Tragic 80.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.8% | Tragic 79.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.5% | Tragic 79.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 77.4% | Tragic 80.6% |
Tsimshian vs Yakama Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 44.8%), single mother households (6.0% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 40.0%), and family households with children (27.0% compared to 30.8%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (67.1% compared to 69.3%, a difference of 3.3%), births to unmarried women (42.2% compared to 40.3%, a difference of 4.5%), and average family size (3.25 compared to 3.45, a difference of 6.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Tsimshian | Yakama |
Family Households | Exceptional 67.1% | Exceptional 69.3% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.0% | Exceptional 30.8% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.7% | Tragic 45.2% |
Average Family Size | Excellent 3.25 | Exceptional 3.45 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 4.2% |
Single Mother Households | Excellent 6.0% | Tragic 8.4% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 47.7% | Tragic 44.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.3% | Tragic 12.3% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 42.2% | Tragic 40.3% |
Tsimshian vs Yakama Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 109.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 62.4%), and no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 29.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 2.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 14.6%), and no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 29.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Tsimshian | Yakama |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.6% | Exceptional 6.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.4% | Exceptional 93.6% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 56.7% | Exceptional 64.9% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Fair 19.1% | Exceptional 31.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Fair 6.2% | Exceptional 12.9% |
Tsimshian vs Yakama Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 114.4%), college, 1 year or more (57.9% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 25.4%), and college, under 1 year (64.3% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.9% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 2.3%), kindergarten (98.8% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 2.3%), and 1st grade (98.8% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 2.4%).
Education Level Metric | Tsimshian | Yakama |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Tragic 3.6% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.9% | Tragic 96.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.8% | Tragic 96.6% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.8% | Tragic 96.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.8% | Tragic 96.4% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.8% | Tragic 95.9% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.6% | Tragic 95.2% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 94.8% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 94.3% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Tragic 91.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 99.0% | Tragic 91.2% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 97.0% | Tragic 90.1% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.6% | Tragic 86.9% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.4% | Tragic 85.0% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.9% | Tragic 82.5% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.3% | Tragic 80.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Excellent 86.6% | Tragic 74.5% |
College, Under 1 year | Poor 64.3% | Tragic 52.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Poor 57.9% | Tragic 46.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 32.3% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 28.8% | Tragic 24.5% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 9.5% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 3.1% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Tragic 1.3% |
Tsimshian vs Yakama Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.4% compared to 1.00%, a difference of 141.1%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 29.9%), and ambulatory disability (8.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 29.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 1.7%), cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 4.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (32.9% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 11.0%).
Disability Metric | Tsimshian | Yakama |
Disability | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 13.4% |
Males | Tragic 15.6% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Tragic 16.8% | Tragic 13.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 2.4% | Exceptional 1.00% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 7.9% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.4% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.7% | Tragic 13.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 32.9% | Tragic 29.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 59.2% | Tragic 51.3% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 2.5% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.7% | Tragic 3.9% |
Cognitive | Average 17.3% | Tragic 18.1% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.8% | Tragic 6.8% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.7% |