Scandinavian vs Yakama Community Comparison

COMPARE

Scandinavian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Yakama
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Scandinavians

Yakama

Good
Poor
7,944
SOCIAL INDEX
76.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
98th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,331
SOCIAL INDEX
10.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
315th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Yakama Integration in Scandinavian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 19,646,901 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Yakama within Scandinavian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.621. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Scandinavians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.386% in Yakama. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Scandinavians corresponds to an increase of 385.6 Yakama.
Scandinavian Integration in Yakama Communities

Scandinavian vs Yakama Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,848 compared to $33,009, a difference of 32.8%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,596 compared to $76,226, a difference of 25.4%), and median family income ($104,410 compared to $83,932, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,654 compared to $54,321, a difference of 3.2%), householder income over 65 years ($61,586 compared to $56,234, a difference of 9.5%), and median female earnings ($38,306 compared to $33,354, a difference of 14.8%).
Scandinavian vs Yakama Income
Income MetricScandinavianYakama
Per Capita Income
Average
$43,848
Tragic
$33,009
Median Family Income
Good
$104,410
Tragic
$83,932
Median Household Income
Good
$86,073
Tragic
$72,225
Median Earnings
Average
$46,433
Tragic
$39,107
Median Male Earnings
Good
$55,527
Tragic
$45,002
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$38,306
Tragic
$33,354
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Good
$52,654
Exceptional
$54,321
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Good
$95,596
Tragic
$76,226
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Good
$102,969
Tragic
$86,992
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Good
$61,586
Tragic
$56,234
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
29.1%
Exceptional
23.7%

Scandinavian vs Yakama Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.7% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 120.1%), married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 115.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.4% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 75.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.3% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 11.3%), single male poverty (13.1% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 21.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.3% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 25.1%).
Scandinavian vs Yakama Poverty
Poverty MetricScandinavianYakama
Poverty
Exceptional
11.1%
Tragic
16.7%
Families
Exceptional
7.6%
Tragic
13.1%
Males
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
15.3%
Females
Exceptional
12.1%
Tragic
18.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Fair
20.3%
Tragic
25.3%
Females 25 to 34 years
Excellent
13.1%
Tragic
17.6%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.7%
Tragic
23.1%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.1%
Tragic
22.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.4%
Tragic
21.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.4%
Tragic
22.6%
Single Males
Poor
13.1%
Tragic
15.9%
Single Females
Average
21.1%
Tragic
28.3%
Single Fathers
Average
16.3%
Tragic
18.1%
Single Mothers
Good
28.9%
Tragic
36.4%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.1%
Tragic
9.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Tragic
14.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
18.3%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.7%
Tragic
21.4%

Scandinavian vs Yakama Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 100.6%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 88.9%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 88.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 12.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 15.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 27.3%).
Scandinavian vs Yakama Unemployment
Unemployment MetricScandinavianYakama
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
7.3%
Males
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
7.9%
Females
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
6.7%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
15.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.4%
Tragic
22.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
13.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Tragic
8.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
9.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
5.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.0%
Tragic
5.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
8.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
6.6%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
6.7%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.7%
Tragic
18.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Excellent
7.4%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
9.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
8.1%

Scandinavian vs Yakama Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 18.2%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 6.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 3.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (78.5% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 4.6%).
Scandinavian vs Yakama Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricScandinavianYakama
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Fair
65.0%
Tragic
62.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.7%
Tragic
75.8%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
43.6%
Good
36.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
78.5%
Average
75.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Excellent
84.9%
Tragic
80.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Fair
84.5%
Tragic
79.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Average
84.4%
Tragic
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
83.0%
Tragic
80.6%

Scandinavian vs Yakama Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 75.9%), single mother households (5.8% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 46.3%), and births to unmarried women (29.8% compared to 40.3%, a difference of 35.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.27%), family households (65.0% compared to 69.3%, a difference of 6.6%), and married-couple households (49.6% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 9.6%).
Scandinavian vs Yakama Family Structure
Family Structure MetricScandinavianYakama
Family Households
Exceptional
65.0%
Exceptional
69.3%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Exceptional
30.8%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.6%
Tragic
45.2%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.14
Exceptional
3.45
Single Father Households
Fair
2.4%
Tragic
4.2%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
8.4%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.5%
Tragic
44.0%
Divorced or Separated
Poor
12.3%
Tragic
12.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.8%
Tragic
40.3%

Scandinavian vs Yakama Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 62.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.6% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 31.2%), and no vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.1% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 0.48%), 2 or more vehicles in household (62.1% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 4.5%), and no vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 6.1%).
Scandinavian vs Yakama Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricScandinavianYakama
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.0%
Exceptional
6.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
93.1%
Exceptional
93.6%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
62.1%
Exceptional
64.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.6%
Exceptional
31.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.0%
Exceptional
12.9%

Scandinavian vs Yakama Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 136.8%), bachelor's degree (37.5% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 53.3%), and master's degree (14.4% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 51.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 2.0%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 2.0%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 2.1%).
Scandinavian vs Yakama Education Level
Education Level MetricScandinavianYakama
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Tragic
3.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.6%
Tragic
96.6%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.6%
Tragic
96.6%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
96.5%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
96.4%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
95.9%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
95.2%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
94.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
94.3%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Tragic
91.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.2%
Tragic
91.2%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Tragic
90.1%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.6%
Tragic
86.9%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Tragic
85.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.2%
Tragic
82.5%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.5%
Tragic
80.0%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.9%
Tragic
74.5%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
67.7%
Tragic
52.6%
College, 1 year or more
Excellent
61.0%
Tragic
46.2%
Associate's Degree
Good
46.9%
Tragic
32.3%
Bachelor's Degree
Average
37.5%
Tragic
24.5%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.4%
Tragic
9.5%
Professional Degree
Fair
4.2%
Tragic
3.1%
Doctorate Degree
Average
1.8%
Tragic
1.3%

Scandinavian vs Yakama Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.00%, a difference of 54.4%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.4% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 26.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.5% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 5.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 6.8%), and cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 6.9%).
Scandinavian vs Yakama Disability
Disability MetricScandinavianYakama
Disability
Tragic
12.4%
Tragic
13.4%
Males
Tragic
12.3%
Tragic
13.5%
Females
Tragic
12.5%
Tragic
13.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
1.00%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.7%
Tragic
9.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
11.9%
Tragic
13.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Average
23.4%
Tragic
29.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.6%
Tragic
51.3%
Vision
Average
2.2%
Tragic
2.5%
Hearing
Tragic
3.6%
Tragic
3.9%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.9%
Tragic
18.1%
Ambulatory
Average
6.1%
Tragic
6.8%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Tragic
2.7%