Immigrants from Central America vs Yakama Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 19,841,199 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Yakama within Immigrant from Central America communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.267. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Central America within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.069% in Yakama. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Central America corresponds to an increase of 68.9 Yakama.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($51,022 compared to $54,321, a difference of 6.5%), per capita income ($34,974 compared to $33,009, a difference of 5.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,420 compared to $56,234, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($45,538 compared to $45,002, a difference of 1.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,965 compared to $86,992, a difference of 1.2%), and median family income ($85,050 compared to $83,932, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (15.0% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 42.8%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 25.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.0% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (21.3% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 2.2%), child poverty under the age of 16 (21.3% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 3.8%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (21.4% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 102.6%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.3% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 68.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 58.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.5% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 4.4%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 6.3%), and female unemployment (6.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.0% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 5.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.5% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.2% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 0.53%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.4% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 39.5%), births to unmarried women (37.4% compared to 40.3%, a difference of 7.7%), and single mother households (8.1% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (44.1% compared to 44.0%, a difference of 0.32%), family households with children (31.0% compared to 30.8%, a difference of 0.57%), and married-couple households (45.7% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 0.95%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 52.6%), no vehicles in household (8.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 35.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.4% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 32.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.1% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 2.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 10.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.4% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 32.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (27.5% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 12.3%), associate's degree (35.0% compared to 32.3%, a difference of 8.4%), and doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (84.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.030%), 4th grade (95.1% compared to 95.2%, a difference of 0.090%), and 5th grade (94.7% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 0.10%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 38.9%), hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 33.7%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.00%, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 0.010%), disability age over 75 (50.5% compared to 51.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 1.6%).