Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Ugandan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,225,592 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Ugandans within Immigrant from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.258. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.077% in Ugandans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina corresponds to an increase of 76.5 Ugandans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($94,288 compared to $103,472, a difference of 9.7%), median household income ($79,888 compared to $87,557, a difference of 9.6%), and median family income ($97,432 compared to $106,541, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,565 compared to $50,923, a difference of 0.71%), wage/income gap (24.8% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 3.3%), and median male earnings ($52,869 compared to $55,290, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 12.1%), male poverty (11.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 11.1%), and family poverty (8.4% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.4% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 0.48%), single female poverty (21.1% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 1.2%), and single mother poverty (29.2% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 47.3%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 21.4%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (5.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.52%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 3.5%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.8% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 7.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.1% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.5% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 0.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.17%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.8% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 5.1%), currently married (46.1% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 4.2%), and average family size (3.15 compared to 3.23, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (61.9% compared to 61.7%, a difference of 0.26%), births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 30.1%, a difference of 0.80%), and married-couple households (44.4% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 15.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 7.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.5% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (53.8% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 0.58%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.5% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 33.1%), professional degree (4.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 27.9%), and master's degree (14.3% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.0%), 2nd grade (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.020%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.030%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 10.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 8.6%), and hearing disability (3.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.72%), disability age over 75 (46.8% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 1.6%).