Immigrants from Laos vs Ugandan Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Laos
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Ugandan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Laos

Ugandans

Fair
Average
2,709
SOCIAL INDEX
24.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
242nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,220
SOCIAL INDEX
59.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
159th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Ugandan Integration in Immigrants from Laos Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 71,484,689 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Ugandans within Immigrant from Laos communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.050. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Laos within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.005% in Ugandans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Laos corresponds to an increase of 5.0 Ugandans.
Immigrants from Laos Integration in Ugandan Communities

Immigrants from Laos vs Ugandan Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,857 compared to $45,047, a difference of 19.0%), median family income ($92,239 compared to $106,541, a difference of 15.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,909 compared to $103,472, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (23.8% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 0.99%), householder income under 25 years ($50,041 compared to $50,923, a difference of 1.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,722 compared to $61,177, a difference of 7.9%).
Immigrants from Laos vs Ugandan Income
Income MetricImmigrants from LaosUgandan
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$37,857
Excellent
$45,047
Median Family Income
Tragic
$92,239
Excellent
$106,541
Median Household Income
Tragic
$78,327
Excellent
$87,557
Median Earnings
Tragic
$42,884
Excellent
$47,854
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$49,190
Good
$55,290
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$36,841
Exceptional
$40,889
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,041
Tragic
$50,923
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$85,553
Good
$96,667
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$90,909
Excellent
$103,472
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$56,722
Average
$61,177
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
23.8%
Exceptional
24.1%

Immigrants from Laos vs Ugandan Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.2% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 13.3%), receiving food stamps (13.8% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 12.4%), and single female poverty (22.9% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.61%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 3.2%), and male poverty (12.6% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 3.4%).
Immigrants from Laos vs Ugandan Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from LaosUgandan
Poverty
Tragic
13.8%
Tragic
13.1%
Families
Tragic
10.2%
Fair
9.3%
Males
Tragic
12.6%
Tragic
12.2%
Females
Tragic
15.0%
Poor
14.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.6%
Tragic
22.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
15.2%
Good
13.4%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.4%
Poor
18.0%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
18.7%
Poor
17.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
18.7%
Poor
17.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.9%
Poor
17.2%
Single Males
Fair
13.0%
Exceptional
12.3%
Single Females
Tragic
22.9%
Good
20.8%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.1%
Average
16.3%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.6%
Good
28.8%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.7%
Fair
5.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Fair
11.1%
Poor
11.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.0%
Good
11.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.8%
Fair
12.2%

Immigrants from Laos vs Ugandan Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 47.3%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 15.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.71%), female unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.1%).
Immigrants from Laos vs Ugandan Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from LaosUgandan
Unemployment
Fair
5.3%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Poor
5.4%
Tragic
5.5%
Females
Average
5.3%
Fair
5.3%
Youth < 25
Good
11.5%
Average
11.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Excellent
17.1%
Exceptional
16.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Fair
10.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.6%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Average
5.5%
Exceptional
4.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Fair
4.7%
Fair
4.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Fair
4.6%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Good
5.1%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Fair
8.9%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Average
7.6%
Good
7.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.2%
Tragic
12.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Fair
5.5%
Tragic
5.9%

Immigrants from Laos vs Ugandan Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.6% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 4.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 1.8%).
Immigrants from Laos vs Ugandan Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from LaosUgandan
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.0%
Exceptional
67.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Fair
79.4%
Exceptional
80.6%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.6%
Exceptional
38.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.4%
Good
75.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Good
84.8%
Exceptional
85.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.2%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.8%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.6%
Exceptional
83.7%

Immigrants from Laos vs Ugandan Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 23.5%), single mother households (7.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 18.0%), and births to unmarried women (34.0% compared to 30.1%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (45.0% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 1.8%), married-couple households (45.1% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 2.9%), and average family size (3.34 compared to 3.23, a difference of 3.2%).
Immigrants from Laos vs Ugandan Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from LaosUgandan
Family Households
Exceptional
65.3%
Tragic
61.7%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
29.8%
Average
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
45.1%
Tragic
43.8%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.34
Average
3.23
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.9%
Good
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.7%
Fair
6.5%
Currently Married
Tragic
45.0%
Tragic
44.2%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.4%
Exceptional
11.8%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
34.0%
Excellent
30.1%

Immigrants from Laos vs Ugandan Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 39.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 34.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.4% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 3.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 10.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.4% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 25.9%).
Immigrants from Laos vs Ugandan Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from LaosUgandan
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.2%
Tragic
11.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.8%
Tragic
88.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.2%
Tragic
53.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.4%
Tragic
17.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
5.7%

Immigrants from Laos vs Ugandan Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 61.8%), professional degree (3.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 57.7%), and no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 53.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (96.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 1.2%).
Immigrants from Laos vs Ugandan Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from LaosUgandan
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.1%
Good
2.0%
Nursery School
Tragic
96.9%
Average
98.0%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.9%
Average
98.0%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Average
97.9%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Average
97.9%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Average
97.8%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.3%
Average
97.6%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.0%
Average
97.4%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.7%
Good
97.1%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.5%
Good
96.2%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.1%
Good
95.9%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.2%
Good
95.1%
10th Grade
Tragic
91.9%
Excellent
94.0%
11th Grade
Tragic
90.5%
Excellent
92.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
88.9%
Good
91.5%
High School Diploma
Tragic
86.6%
Excellent
89.7%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
82.7%
Good
86.1%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.3%
Excellent
66.8%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
54.7%
Exceptional
61.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
40.7%
Exceptional
48.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
31.6%
Exceptional
40.8%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Exceptional
17.1%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.2%
Exceptional
5.1%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Exceptional
2.2%

Immigrants from Laos vs Ugandan Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (26.1% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 14.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (13.0% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 14.5%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 1.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 4.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 5.8%).
Immigrants from Laos vs Ugandan Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from LaosUgandan
Disability
Tragic
12.4%
Excellent
11.4%
Males
Tragic
11.9%
Excellent
11.0%
Females
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
11.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Fair
1.3%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.2%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.0%
Average
11.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
26.1%
Excellent
22.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.2%
Exceptional
46.3%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Excellent
2.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.1%
Tragic
18.3%
Ambulatory
Poor
6.3%
Exceptional
5.7%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
2.3%