New Zealander vs Ugandan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 56,417,416 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Ugandans within New Zealander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.413. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in New Zealanders within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.371% in Ugandans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 New Zealanders corresponds to an increase of 371.1 Ugandans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 15.2%), per capita income ($50,575 compared to $45,047, a difference of 12.3%), and median male earnings ($61,199 compared to $55,290, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($42,446 compared to $40,889, a difference of 3.8%), householder income under 25 years ($53,294 compared to $50,923, a difference of 4.7%), and median earnings ($51,246 compared to $47,854, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 23.4%), married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 20.0%), and family poverty (8.1% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (21.0% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 0.70%), single mother poverty (29.1% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 0.88%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 40.5%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 12.7%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.8% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.33%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.51%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 2.6%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 0.19%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 0.89%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 15.6%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 10.8%), and married-couple households (47.2% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.58%), births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 30.1%, a difference of 0.84%), and family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 14.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 13.4%), and no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 6.0%), and no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 12.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 22.6%), professional degree (6.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 16.4%), and doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.43%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.43%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.44%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 14.1%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 10.7%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.090%), disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 0.22%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.9% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 0.58%).