Swedish vs Ugandan Community Comparison

COMPARE

Swedish
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Ugandan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Swedes

Ugandans

Excellent
Average
8,881
SOCIAL INDEX
86.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
41st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,220
SOCIAL INDEX
59.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
159th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Ugandan Integration in Swedish Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,373,393 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Ugandans within Swedish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.655. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Swedes within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.016% in Ugandans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Swedes corresponds to an increase of 15.8 Ugandans.
Swedish Integration in Ugandan Communities

Swedish vs Ugandan Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Swedish and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (29.4% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 22.3%), householder income under 25 years ($52,986 compared to $50,923, a difference of 4.1%), and median male earnings ($57,445 compared to $55,290, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($47,851 compared to $47,854, a difference of 0.010%), median household income ($88,524 compared to $87,557, a difference of 1.1%), and per capita income ($45,750 compared to $45,047, a difference of 1.6%).
Swedish vs Ugandan Income
Income MetricSwedishUgandan
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,750
Excellent
$45,047
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$108,499
Excellent
$106,541
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$88,524
Excellent
$87,557
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,851
Excellent
$47,854
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$57,445
Good
$55,290
Median Female Earnings
Fair
$39,421
Exceptional
$40,889
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Excellent
$52,986
Tragic
$50,923
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$99,136
Good
$96,667
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$106,377
Excellent
$103,472
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Excellent
$62,736
Average
$61,177
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
29.4%
Exceptional
24.1%

Swedish vs Ugandan Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Swedish and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 38.4%), receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 33.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 30.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.3% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 0.26%), single female poverty (20.6% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 1.0%), and single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 1.5%).
Swedish vs Ugandan Poverty
Poverty MetricSwedishUgandan
Poverty
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
13.1%
Families
Exceptional
7.1%
Fair
9.3%
Males
Exceptional
9.6%
Tragic
12.2%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Poor
14.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Average
20.1%
Tragic
22.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.7%
Good
13.4%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Poor
18.0%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.3%
Poor
17.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.6%
Poor
17.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.7%
Poor
17.2%
Single Males
Poor
13.1%
Exceptional
12.3%
Single Females
Good
20.6%
Good
20.8%
Single Fathers
Average
16.3%
Average
16.3%
Single Mothers
Excellent
28.4%
Good
28.8%
Married Couples
Exceptional
3.9%
Fair
5.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
8.7%
Poor
11.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.2%
Good
11.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.2%
Fair
12.2%

Swedish vs Ugandan Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Swedish and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 39.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 29.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 26.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 2.4%).
Swedish vs Ugandan Unemployment
Unemployment MetricSwedishUgandan
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.4%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
5.5%
Females
Exceptional
4.4%
Fair
5.3%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.4%
Average
11.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.3%
Exceptional
16.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.5%
Fair
10.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
4.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Fair
4.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.0%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.0%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Excellent
7.4%
Good
7.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
12.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.9%

Swedish vs Ugandan Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Swedish and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (44.1% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 13.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.8% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.31%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 0.32%).
Swedish vs Ugandan Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricSwedishUgandan
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Average
65.1%
Exceptional
67.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.3%
Exceptional
80.6%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
44.1%
Exceptional
38.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
78.8%
Good
75.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.6%
Exceptional
85.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.2%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.0%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.7%
Exceptional
83.7%

Swedish vs Ugandan Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Swedish and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 18.2%), married-couple households (49.7% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 13.4%), and currently married (50.0% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.050%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.28%), and births to unmarried women (29.6% compared to 30.1%, a difference of 1.5%).
Swedish vs Ugandan Family Structure
Family Structure MetricSwedishUgandan
Family Households
Good
64.5%
Tragic
61.7%
Family Households with Children
Fair
27.4%
Average
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.7%
Tragic
43.8%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.10
Average
3.23
Single Father Households
Good
2.3%
Good
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.5%
Fair
6.5%
Currently Married
Exceptional
50.0%
Tragic
44.2%
Divorced or Separated
Fair
12.1%
Exceptional
11.8%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.6%
Excellent
30.1%

Swedish vs Ugandan Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Swedish and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 68.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 33.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 29.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 5.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.8% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 15.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 29.2%).
Swedish vs Ugandan Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricSwedishUgandan
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.8%
Tragic
11.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
93.3%
Tragic
88.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
61.8%
Tragic
53.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.0%
Tragic
17.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.6%
Tragic
5.7%

Swedish vs Ugandan Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Swedish and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 45.7%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 12.7%), and professional degree (4.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (48.4% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 0.63%), nursery school (98.7% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.69%), and kindergarten (98.7% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.70%).
Swedish vs Ugandan Education Level
Education Level MetricSwedishUgandan
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.4%
Good
2.0%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.7%
Average
98.0%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.7%
Average
98.0%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Average
97.9%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Average
97.9%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Average
97.8%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Average
97.6%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Average
97.4%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Good
97.1%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Good
96.2%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Good
95.9%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Good
95.1%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.9%
Excellent
94.0%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.9%
Excellent
92.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.7%
Good
91.5%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
92.2%
Excellent
89.7%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.8%
Good
86.1%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.7%
Excellent
66.8%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.1%
Exceptional
61.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.4%
Exceptional
48.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Good
39.1%
Exceptional
40.8%
Master's Degree
Good
15.2%
Exceptional
17.1%
Professional Degree
Good
4.5%
Exceptional
5.1%
Doctorate Degree
Excellent
2.0%
Exceptional
2.2%

Swedish vs Ugandan Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Swedish and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 39.0%), hearing disability (3.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 25.8%), and cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 0.52%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.80%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.1%).
Swedish vs Ugandan Disability
Disability MetricSwedishUgandan
Disability
Tragic
12.2%
Excellent
11.4%
Males
Tragic
12.1%
Excellent
11.0%
Females
Fair
12.3%
Exceptional
11.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.6%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.5%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Fair
11.4%
Average
11.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.4%
Excellent
22.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.7%
Exceptional
46.3%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
3.6%
Excellent
2.9%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.5%
Tragic
18.3%
Ambulatory
Excellent
6.0%
Exceptional
5.7%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Exceptional
2.3%