Chinese vs Ugandan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,994,299 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Ugandans within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.634. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.638% in Ugandans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to an increase of 637.7 Ugandans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $61,177, a difference of 26.6%), householder income under 25 years ($58,162 compared to $50,923, a difference of 14.2%), and median household income ($98,496 compared to $87,557, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $40,889, a difference of 1.4%), median earnings ($48,836 compared to $47,854, a difference of 2.1%), and per capita income ($46,098 compared to $45,047, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 46.3%), child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 46.0%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (11.9% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 43.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 5.5%), single male poverty (11.0% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 12.1%), and single mother poverty (24.6% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 17.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 30.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 29.9%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 4.1%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 4.3%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.0% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 4.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 0.14%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.26%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.51%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 25.8%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 17.4%), and married-couple households (50.4% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 30.1%, a difference of 0.50%), average family size (3.34 compared to 3.23, a difference of 3.3%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 54.7%), no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 38.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 34.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 3.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 12.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 34.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 39.1%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 26.1%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (48.5% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 0.38%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.58%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.58%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 31.1%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 28.2%), and cognitive disability (15.9% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 0.34%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and female disability (12.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 3.9%).