Malaysian vs Ugandan Community Comparison

COMPARE

Malaysian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Ugandan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Malaysians

Ugandans

Fair
Average
3,136
SOCIAL INDEX
28.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
232nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,220
SOCIAL INDEX
59.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
159th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Ugandan Integration in Malaysian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 75,138,474 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Ugandans within Malaysian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.447. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Malaysians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.081% in Ugandans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Malaysians corresponds to an increase of 81.4 Ugandans.
Malaysian Integration in Ugandan Communities

Malaysian vs Ugandan Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,194 compared to $45,047, a difference of 14.9%), median family income ($95,230 compared to $106,541, a difference of 11.9%), and median female earnings ($37,298 compared to $40,889, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,615 compared to $50,923, a difference of 1.4%), wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 4.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($58,244 compared to $61,177, a difference of 5.0%).
Malaysian vs Ugandan Income
Income MetricMalaysianUgandan
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,194
Excellent
$45,047
Median Family Income
Tragic
$95,230
Excellent
$106,541
Median Household Income
Tragic
$81,064
Excellent
$87,557
Median Earnings
Tragic
$43,844
Excellent
$47,854
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$50,772
Good
$55,290
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$37,298
Exceptional
$40,889
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Poor
$51,615
Tragic
$50,923
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$88,291
Good
$96,667
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$94,517
Excellent
$103,472
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$58,244
Average
$61,177
Wage/Income Gap
Excellent
25.0%
Exceptional
24.1%

Malaysian vs Ugandan Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.9% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 11.2%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.7% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 10.2%), and single father poverty (14.9% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of poverty (13.1% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 0.030%), married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.29%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.95%).
Malaysian vs Ugandan Poverty
Poverty MetricMalaysianUgandan
Poverty
Tragic
13.1%
Tragic
13.1%
Families
Poor
9.6%
Fair
9.3%
Males
Tragic
12.0%
Tragic
12.2%
Females
Tragic
14.3%
Poor
14.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Good
19.9%
Tragic
22.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.7%
Good
13.4%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
18.4%
Poor
18.0%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
17.5%
Poor
17.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
17.6%
Poor
17.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
17.8%
Poor
17.2%
Single Males
Good
12.6%
Exceptional
12.3%
Single Females
Tragic
22.2%
Good
20.8%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.9%
Average
16.3%
Single Mothers
Poor
29.7%
Good
28.8%
Married Couples
Fair
5.4%
Fair
5.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.8%
Poor
11.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.8%
Good
11.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
12.7%
Fair
12.2%

Malaysian vs Ugandan Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 40.6%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 15.9%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.58%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.0% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.2%).
Malaysian vs Ugandan Unemployment
Unemployment MetricMalaysianUgandan
Unemployment
Average
5.3%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Fair
5.3%
Tragic
5.5%
Females
Average
5.3%
Fair
5.3%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.4%
Average
11.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
17.0%
Exceptional
16.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Fair
10.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.6%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Average
5.5%
Exceptional
4.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Fair
4.7%
Fair
4.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Average
4.5%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Poor
8.9%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Fair
7.7%
Good
7.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
12.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Fair
5.5%
Tragic
5.9%

Malaysian vs Ugandan Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-24 (77.2% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age 16-19 (39.7% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 1.8%).
Malaysian vs Ugandan Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricMalaysianUgandan
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.1%
Exceptional
67.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Fair
79.5%
Exceptional
80.6%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.7%
Exceptional
38.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.2%
Good
75.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Average
84.6%
Exceptional
85.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.1%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.8%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.0%
Exceptional
83.7%

Malaysian vs Ugandan Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 17.8%), births to unmarried women (33.9% compared to 30.1%, a difference of 12.6%), and single mother households (7.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.31 compared to 3.23, a difference of 2.3%), currently married (45.9% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 3.8%), and divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 5.0%).
Malaysian vs Ugandan Family Structure
Family Structure MetricMalaysianUgandan
Family Households
Exceptional
65.9%
Tragic
61.7%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
29.8%
Average
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Average
46.3%
Tragic
43.8%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.31
Average
3.23
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.7%
Good
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.3%
Fair
6.5%
Currently Married
Poor
45.9%
Tragic
44.2%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.4%
Exceptional
11.8%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
33.9%
Excellent
30.1%

Malaysian vs Ugandan Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 48.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 33.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 27.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 3.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 11.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 27.2%).
Malaysian vs Ugandan Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricMalaysianUgandan
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
11.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.3%
Tragic
88.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.8%
Tragic
53.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.6%
Tragic
17.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
5.7%

Malaysian vs Ugandan Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 52.9%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 50.7%), and master's degree (12.0% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 42.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.76%), kindergarten (97.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.76%), and 1st grade (97.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.76%).
Malaysian vs Ugandan Education Level
Education Level MetricMalaysianUgandan
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.8%
Good
2.0%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.3%
Average
98.0%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.2%
Average
98.0%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Average
97.9%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.1%
Average
97.9%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Average
97.8%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Average
97.6%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Average
97.4%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.2%
Good
97.1%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.8%
Good
96.2%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.5%
Good
95.9%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.5%
Good
95.1%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.2%
Excellent
94.0%
11th Grade
Tragic
90.8%
Excellent
92.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.2%
Good
91.5%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.0%
Excellent
89.7%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.3%
Good
86.1%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.2%
Excellent
66.8%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.6%
Exceptional
61.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
41.6%
Exceptional
48.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
32.9%
Exceptional
40.8%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.0%
Exceptional
17.1%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.4%
Exceptional
5.1%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.2%

Malaysian vs Ugandan Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 13.7%), disability age 65 to 74 (25.4% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 11.7%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 2.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 3.1%), and female disability (12.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 5.5%).
Malaysian vs Ugandan Disability
Disability MetricMalaysianUgandan
Disability
Tragic
12.2%
Excellent
11.4%
Males
Tragic
11.8%
Excellent
11.0%
Females
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
11.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Poor
1.3%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.2%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.5%
Average
11.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.4%
Excellent
22.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.0%
Exceptional
46.3%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Excellent
2.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.9%
Tragic
18.3%
Ambulatory
Fair
6.2%
Exceptional
5.7%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.5%
Exceptional
2.3%