Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Ugandan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 78,919,300 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Ugandans within Immigrant from Hong Kong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.037. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Hong Kong within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Ugandans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Hong Kong corresponds to an increase of 4.1 Ugandans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($128,140 compared to $96,667, a difference of 32.6%), median household income ($111,519 compared to $87,557, a difference of 27.4%), and median male earnings ($70,146 compared to $55,290, a difference of 26.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.5% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 6.1%), householder income over 65 years ($71,567 compared to $61,177, a difference of 17.0%), and median female earnings ($49,818 compared to $40,889, a difference of 21.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (12.4% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 45.2%), child poverty among boys under 16 (12.3% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 41.4%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (12.1% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 40.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 3.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 8.1%), and married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 13.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 67.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (5.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 30.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.13%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.44%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 0.81%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.5% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 27.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.6% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.11%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.12%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (4.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 34.3%), births to unmarried women (23.6% compared to 30.1%, a difference of 27.6%), and single father households (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 26.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.36%), average family size (3.26 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.78%), and family households (66.1% compared to 61.7%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 13.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 7.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 0.14%), no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.7% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 31.9%), professional degree (6.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 25.3%), and doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 24.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (91.3% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 0.23%), high school diploma (89.3% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 0.49%), and nursery school (97.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.66%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (4.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 43.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (8.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 38.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.2% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 33.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 0.40%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and ambulatory disability (5.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 7.4%).