Immigrants from Oceania vs Ugandan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 82,916,649 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Ugandans within Immigrant from Oceania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.237. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Oceania within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.023% in Ugandans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Oceania corresponds to an increase of 22.7 Ugandans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.6% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 6.6%), householder income under 25 years ($53,680 compared to $50,923, a difference of 5.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,416 compared to $61,177, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($106,453 compared to $106,541, a difference of 0.080%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,705 compared to $103,472, a difference of 0.23%), and per capita income ($45,220 compared to $45,047, a difference of 0.38%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 11.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 9.5%), and male poverty (11.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.7% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 0.55%), single male poverty (12.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.71%), and single female poverty (20.7% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 0.77%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 48.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 16.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.18%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 2.9%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.9% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple households (46.9% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 7.0%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 6.1%), and currently married (46.5% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.2%), births to unmarried women (30.6% compared to 30.1%, a difference of 1.6%), and average family size (3.29 compared to 3.23, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 33.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 22.6%), and no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 1.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 7.6%), and no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 17.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (14.7% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 16.8%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 16.6%), and professional degree (4.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.18%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.18%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 13.2%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 10.9%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.35%), female disability (12.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.2%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 2.2%).