Choctaw vs Turkish Community Comparison

COMPARE

Choctaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Turkish
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Choctaw

Turks

Fair
Exceptional
2,496
SOCIAL INDEX
22.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
254th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,373
SOCIAL INDEX
91.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
17th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Turkish Integration in Choctaw Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 165,358,360 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Turks within Choctaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.647. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Choctaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.028% in Turks. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Choctaw corresponds to an increase of 27.8 Turks.
Choctaw Integration in Turkish Communities

Choctaw vs Turkish Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($35,999 compared to $52,391, a difference of 45.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,287 compared to $117,814, a difference of 43.2%), and median family income ($84,835 compared to $121,202, a difference of 42.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 1.6%), householder income under 25 years ($45,450 compared to $54,266, a difference of 19.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,060 compared to $68,037, a difference of 28.2%).
Choctaw vs Turkish Income
Income MetricChoctawTurkish
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$35,999
Exceptional
$52,391
Median Family Income
Tragic
$84,835
Exceptional
$121,202
Median Household Income
Tragic
$69,947
Exceptional
$99,389
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,270
Exceptional
$53,919
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$47,729
Exceptional
$64,253
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,775
Exceptional
$44,695
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,450
Exceptional
$54,266
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$78,168
Exceptional
$110,318
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$82,287
Exceptional
$117,814
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,060
Exceptional
$68,037
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.1%
Tragic
27.7%

Choctaw vs Turkish Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (23.5% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 61.3%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 58.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (21.0% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 57.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 7.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 13.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.3% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 24.4%).
Choctaw vs Turkish Poverty
Poverty MetricChoctawTurkish
Poverty
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
11.0%
Families
Tragic
11.6%
Exceptional
7.5%
Males
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
10.0%
Females
Tragic
16.8%
Exceptional
11.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
24.3%
Exceptional
19.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
18.1%
Exceptional
11.4%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.5%
Exceptional
14.6%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
21.0%
Exceptional
13.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.3%
Exceptional
13.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
21.1%
Exceptional
13.7%
Single Males
Tragic
17.0%
Exceptional
12.1%
Single Females
Tragic
27.2%
Exceptional
18.7%
Single Fathers
Tragic
20.7%
Exceptional
15.8%
Single Mothers
Tragic
36.4%
Exceptional
26.4%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Poor
11.4%
Exceptional
10.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Fair
12.5%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.6%
Exceptional
9.5%

Choctaw vs Turkish Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 39.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 26.4%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.65%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 2.3%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 3.2%).
Choctaw vs Turkish Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChoctawTurkish
Unemployment
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.1%
Excellent
11.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.0%
Good
17.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.6%
Average
10.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.5%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.7%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Fair
8.8%
Good
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.8%
Exceptional
7.0%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.9%
Average
8.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
5.0%

Choctaw vs Turkish Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (61.5% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 7.6%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 7.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (78.2% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.4% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.5% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 5.7%).
Choctaw vs Turkish Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChoctawTurkish
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
61.5%
Exceptional
66.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
75.4%
Exceptional
80.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.0%
Tragic
35.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Fair
74.7%
Tragic
73.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
81.0%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.4%
Exceptional
85.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
80.5%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
78.2%
Exceptional
83.8%

Choctaw vs Turkish Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 37.3%), births to unmarried women (36.9% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 34.4%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.21 compared to 3.16, a difference of 1.6%), family households (64.9% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and family households with children (28.1% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.3%).
Choctaw vs Turkish Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChoctawTurkish
Family Households
Exceptional
64.9%
Tragic
63.6%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.1%
Average
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Fair
46.0%
Exceptional
47.8%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.21
Tragic
3.16
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
5.5%
Currently Married
Fair
46.3%
Exceptional
47.8%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
11.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.9%
Exceptional
27.4%

Choctaw vs Turkish Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 48.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 33.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 4.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 9.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 24.7%).
Choctaw vs Turkish Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChoctawTurkish
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.9%
Tragic
11.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.2%
Tragic
88.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.3%
Poor
54.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.0%
Tragic
18.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.8%
Tragic
5.8%

Choctaw vs Turkish Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 92.2%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 84.4%), and master's degree (11.0% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 80.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (98.1% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.020%), 4th grade (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.020%), and 5th grade (97.7% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.020%).
Choctaw vs Turkish Education Level
Education Level MetricChoctawTurkish
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
1.8%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Exceptional
97.7%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Exceptional
97.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Exceptional
96.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.2%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Excellent
95.1%
Exceptional
95.8%
10th Grade
Fair
93.6%
Exceptional
95.0%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.8%
Exceptional
94.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.8%
Exceptional
93.0%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.8%
Exceptional
91.2%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.1%
Exceptional
88.5%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
59.3%
Exceptional
70.7%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
52.3%
Exceptional
65.5%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
37.8%
Exceptional
53.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
29.4%
Exceptional
46.2%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.0%
Exceptional
19.9%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.2%
Exceptional
6.2%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Exceptional
2.7%

Choctaw vs Turkish Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 72.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.4% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 70.1%), and disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 65.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 8.9%), disability age over 75 (52.7% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 15.4%), and self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 34.8%).
Choctaw vs Turkish Disability
Disability MetricChoctawTurkish
Disability
Tragic
15.4%
Exceptional
10.7%
Males
Tragic
15.4%
Exceptional
10.3%
Females
Tragic
15.4%
Exceptional
11.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.9%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.4%
Exceptional
9.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
30.2%
Exceptional
21.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
52.7%
Exceptional
45.7%
Vision
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
1.9%
Hearing
Tragic
4.5%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.4%
Exceptional
16.9%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.3%
Exceptional
5.5%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.0%
Exceptional
2.2%