Czech vs Turkish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 259,241,692 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Turks within Czech communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.148. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.010% in Turks. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechs corresponds to an increase of 10.2 Turks.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czech and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($44,595 compared to $52,391, a difference of 17.5%), median household income ($86,164 compared to $99,389, a difference of 15.3%), and median female earnings ($38,992 compared to $44,695, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (29.2% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 5.3%), householder income under 25 years ($51,421 compared to $54,266, a difference of 5.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,244 compared to $68,037, a difference of 11.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czech and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 13.3%), single female poverty (21.0% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 12.8%), and single male poverty (13.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (11.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.20%), poverty (10.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and family poverty (7.4% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czech and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (4.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 13.8%), female unemployment (4.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 13.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.62%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czech and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 23.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.5% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 6.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.16%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 0.21%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czech and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 17.2%), births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 11.2%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.42%), family households (64.5% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and average family size (3.11 compared to 3.16, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czech and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 69.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 26.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 5.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 13.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 22.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czech and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 41.9%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 41.3%), and master's degree (14.7% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 35.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (93.2% compared to 93.0%, a difference of 0.22%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.35%), and kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czech and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 37.0%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 25.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 0.040%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 3.3%).