Houma vs Turkish Community Comparison
COMPARE
Houma
Turkish
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Houma
Turks
384
SOCIAL INDEX
1.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
346th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,373
SOCIAL INDEX
91.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
17th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Turkish Integration in Houma Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 31,649,846 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Turks within Houma communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.728. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Houma within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.195% in Turks. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Houma corresponds to an increase of 194.5 Turks.
Houma vs Turkish Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Houma and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($72,093 compared to $117,814, a difference of 63.4%), median family income ($76,188 compared to $121,202, a difference of 59.1%), and median household income ($62,575 compared to $99,389, a difference of 58.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($44,356 compared to $54,266, a difference of 22.3%), median male earnings ($50,547 compared to $64,253, a difference of 27.1%), and median earnings ($38,949 compared to $53,919, a difference of 38.4%).
Income Metric | Houma | Turkish |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $32,996 | Exceptional $52,391 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $76,188 | Exceptional $121,202 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $62,575 | Exceptional $99,389 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $38,949 | Exceptional $53,919 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $50,547 | Exceptional $64,253 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $30,343 | Exceptional $44,695 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,356 | Exceptional $54,266 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,044 | Exceptional $110,318 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $72,093 | Exceptional $117,814 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $44,822 | Exceptional $68,037 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 38.7% | Tragic 27.7% |
Houma vs Turkish Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Houma and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (22.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 99.4%), family poverty (14.6% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 94.7%), and single male poverty (23.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 93.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (26.2% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 34.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 39.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 47.1%).
Poverty Metric | Houma | Turkish |
Poverty | Tragic 18.4% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Families | Tragic 14.6% | Exceptional 7.5% |
Males | Tragic 16.7% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Females | Tragic 20.0% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 26.2% | Exceptional 19.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 22.7% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 22.7% | Exceptional 14.6% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 24.9% | Exceptional 13.4% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 26.2% | Exceptional 13.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 21.5% | Exceptional 13.7% |
Single Males | Tragic 23.5% | Exceptional 12.1% |
Single Females | Tragic 33.8% | Exceptional 18.7% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 26.7% | Exceptional 15.8% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 43.5% | Exceptional 26.4% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.4% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 14.7% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 16.2% | Excellent 11.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 16.5% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Houma vs Turkish Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Houma and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (7.8% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 83.3%), male unemployment (7.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 43.0%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (8.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 40.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 6.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 6.4%).
Unemployment Metric | Houma | Turkish |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.7% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Males | Tragic 7.1% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Females | Tragic 6.4% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.8% | Excellent 11.4% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 21.6% | Good 17.3% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 12.6% | Average 10.3% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 8.7% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 7.2% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 7.8% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Fair 4.9% | Excellent 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.8% | Good 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.8% | Excellent 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.1% | Good 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.4% | Exceptional 7.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 12.5% | Average 8.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.8% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Houma vs Turkish Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Houma and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (74.1% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 13.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (59.5% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 11.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (72.7% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 0.38%), in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 0.59%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.2% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 5.4%).
Labor Participation Metric | Houma | Turkish |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 59.5% | Exceptional 66.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 72.7% | Exceptional 80.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Poor 35.6% | Tragic 35.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 73.7% | Tragic 73.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.2% | Exceptional 85.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 79.9% | Exceptional 85.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 79.5% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 74.1% | Exceptional 83.8% |
Houma vs Turkish Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Houma and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (46.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 69.6%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 47.8%), and single mother households (7.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 44.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.16, a difference of 0.44%), family households (65.7% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 3.3%), and family households with children (28.5% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 4.0%).
Family Structure Metric | Houma | Turkish |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.7% | Tragic 63.6% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.5% | Average 27.4% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 44.6% | Exceptional 47.8% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.18 | Tragic 3.16 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.9% | Exceptional 5.5% |
Currently Married | Tragic 45.5% | Exceptional 47.8% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.6% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 46.6% | Exceptional 27.4% |
Houma vs Turkish Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Houma and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 18.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (16.1% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 14.8%), and no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 0.23%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 0.27%), and no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Houma | Turkish |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 11.5% | Tragic 11.7% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 88.6% | Tragic 88.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Poor 54.4% | Poor 54.3% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 18.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 4.9% | Tragic 5.8% |
Houma vs Turkish Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Houma and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 180.0%), doctorate degree (0.96% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 178.3%), and master's degree (7.9% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 151.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.1% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.95%), 2nd grade (97.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.98%), and kindergarten (97.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.99%).
Education Level Metric | Houma | Turkish |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Exceptional 98.2% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Exceptional 98.2% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.1% | Exceptional 98.1% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Exceptional 97.9% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.6% | Exceptional 97.7% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.2% | Exceptional 97.5% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.1% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Tragic 94.2% | Exceptional 96.5% |
9th Grade | Tragic 92.3% | Exceptional 95.8% |
10th Grade | Tragic 90.2% | Exceptional 95.0% |
11th Grade | Tragic 87.0% | Exceptional 94.0% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 83.7% | Exceptional 93.0% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 81.5% | Exceptional 91.2% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 75.0% | Exceptional 88.5% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 47.6% | Exceptional 70.7% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 41.2% | Exceptional 65.5% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 28.2% | Exceptional 53.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 21.4% | Exceptional 46.2% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 7.9% | Exceptional 19.9% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 2.2% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 0.96% | Exceptional 2.7% |
Houma vs Turkish Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Houma and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (18.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 93.7%), vision disability (3.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 80.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (9.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 77.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 13.8%), disability age over 75 (56.2% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 23.0%), and self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 33.1%).
Disability Metric | Houma | Turkish |
Disability | Tragic 17.1% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Males | Tragic 17.4% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Females | Tragic 16.9% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.9% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 9.1% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.7% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 18.7% | Exceptional 9.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 32.3% | Exceptional 21.0% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 56.2% | Exceptional 45.7% |
Vision | Tragic 3.4% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.2% | Exceptional 2.8% |
Cognitive | Tragic 19.3% | Exceptional 16.9% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 9.3% | Exceptional 5.5% |
Self-Care | Tragic 3.0% | Exceptional 2.2% |