Immigrants from China vs Turkish Single Mother Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
Turkish
Single Mother Poverty
Single Mother Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from China
Turks
26.1%
SINGLE MOTHER POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
20th/ 347
METRIC RANK
26.4%
SINGLE MOTHER POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
30th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from China vs Turkish Single Mother Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 441,985,494 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among single mothers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.131 and weighted average of 26.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 265,895,030 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among single mothers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.454 and weighted average of 26.4%, a difference of 1.3%.
Single Mother Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from China | Turkish |
| Minimum | 12.6% | 2.2% |
| Maximum | 53.5% | 100.0% |
| Range | 41.0% | 97.8% |
| Mean | 24.9% | 32.5% |
| Median | 23.4% | 24.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 20.0% | 21.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 28.2% | 32.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.2% | 11.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.3% | 24.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.2% | 24.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China and Turks by Single Mother Poverty
In terms of single mother poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (26.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Bolivia (26.2%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Pakistan (26.0%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Korea (26.2%, a difference of 0.36%), and Burmese (26.2%, a difference of 0.54%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Jordanian (26.4%, a difference of 0.090%), Korean (26.4%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Japan (26.4%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Philippines (26.5%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Sri Lanka (26.3%, a difference of 0.38%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Mother Poverty |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 25.8% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 25.9% |
| Asians | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 26.0% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 26.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 26.1% |
| Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 26.1% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 26.2% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 26.2% |
| Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 26.2% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 26.2% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 26.3% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 26.3% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 26.4% |
| Koreans | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 26.4% |
| Jordanians | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 26.4% |
| Turks | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 26.4% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 26.5% |
| Tongans | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 26.5% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 26.5% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.9 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 26.6% |
| Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 26.6% |