Uruguayan vs Turkish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 115,036,733 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Turks within Uruguayan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.445. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Uruguayans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.082% in Turks. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Uruguayans corresponds to an increase of 82.4 Turks.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($100,656 compared to $121,202, a difference of 20.4%), median male earnings ($53,680 compared to $64,253, a difference of 19.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($98,660 compared to $117,814, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,465 compared to $54,266, a difference of 3.4%), wage/income gap (25.2% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 10.1%), and median female earnings ($39,228 compared to $44,695, a difference of 13.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 24.8%), receiving food stamps (11.8% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 24.7%), and family poverty (9.1% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.9% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 0.58%), single male poverty (11.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.8% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 17.5%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.8% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 12.4%), and female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.5% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 0.75%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.98%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.9% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 0.94%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 0.85%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 0.30%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 0.33%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.44%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.1% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 20.6%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 20.2%), and single mother households (6.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.95%), family households (64.5% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.16, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 3.6%), no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 3.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.8% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 0.43%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.7% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 3.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 50.7%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 34.0%), and master's degree (15.3% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 30.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.47%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.47%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.48%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 14.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 9.7%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.39%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 0.52%), and disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 1.3%).