Celtic vs Turkish Community Comparison

COMPARE

Celtic
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Turkish
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Celtics

Turks

Average
Exceptional
5,342
SOCIAL INDEX
50.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
179th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,373
SOCIAL INDEX
91.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
17th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Turkish Integration in Celtic Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 122,998,097 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Turks within Celtic communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.342. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Celtics within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.294% in Turks. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Celtics corresponds to an increase of 293.6 Turks.
Celtic Integration in Turkish Communities

Celtic vs Turkish Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Celtic and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,621 compared to $52,391, a difference of 20.1%), median family income ($101,139 compared to $121,202, a difference of 19.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($92,241 compared to $110,318, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 1.6%), householder income under 25 years ($50,447 compared to $54,266, a difference of 7.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($60,608 compared to $68,037, a difference of 12.3%).
Celtic vs Turkish Income
Income MetricCelticTurkish
Per Capita Income
Average
$43,621
Exceptional
$52,391
Median Family Income
Fair
$101,139
Exceptional
$121,202
Median Household Income
Fair
$83,193
Exceptional
$99,389
Median Earnings
Fair
$45,732
Exceptional
$53,919
Median Male Earnings
Average
$54,242
Exceptional
$64,253
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$38,283
Exceptional
$44,695
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,447
Exceptional
$54,266
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Fair
$92,241
Exceptional
$110,318
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Fair
$98,896
Exceptional
$117,814
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$60,608
Exceptional
$68,037
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.3%
Tragic
27.7%

Celtic vs Turkish Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Celtic and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 27.5%), child poverty among girls under 16 (17.0% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 24.1%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (17.9% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.8% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 1.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 5.9%), and married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 10.7%).
Celtic vs Turkish Poverty
Poverty MetricCelticTurkish
Poverty
Average
12.3%
Exceptional
11.0%
Families
Good
8.8%
Exceptional
7.5%
Males
Average
11.2%
Exceptional
10.0%
Females
Average
13.4%
Exceptional
11.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.6%
Exceptional
19.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.5%
Exceptional
11.4%
Children Under 5 years
Poor
17.9%
Exceptional
14.6%
Children Under 16 years
Fair
16.4%
Exceptional
13.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Average
16.6%
Exceptional
13.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Fair
17.0%
Exceptional
13.7%
Single Males
Tragic
14.5%
Exceptional
12.1%
Single Females
Tragic
22.7%
Exceptional
18.7%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.5%
Exceptional
15.8%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.9%
Exceptional
26.4%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Exceptional
10.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.0%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
10.9%
Exceptional
9.5%

Celtic vs Turkish Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Celtic and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.3% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 17.9%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 11.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.23%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.51%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.53%).
Celtic vs Turkish Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCelticTurkish
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Excellent
11.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.6%
Good
17.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Average
10.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.4%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Good
4.7%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Excellent
4.4%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.1%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
5.3%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.3%
Good
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.3%
Exceptional
7.0%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.5%
Average
8.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.4%
Exceptional
5.0%

Celtic vs Turkish Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Celtic and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.3% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 16.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.8% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 1.9%).
Celtic vs Turkish Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCelticTurkish
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.8%
Exceptional
66.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.7%
Exceptional
80.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
41.3%
Tragic
35.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.1%
Tragic
73.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Average
84.7%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.1%
Exceptional
85.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.8%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.8%
Exceptional
83.8%

Celtic vs Turkish Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Celtic and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 21.3%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 17.8%), and divorced or separated (13.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.8% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 0.040%), family households (63.8% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 0.21%), and married-couple households (47.3% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 1.1%).
Celtic vs Turkish Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCelticTurkish
Family Households
Tragic
63.8%
Tragic
63.6%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.6%
Average
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Excellent
47.3%
Exceptional
47.8%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.11
Tragic
3.16
Single Father Households
Average
2.3%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Good
6.1%
Exceptional
5.5%
Currently Married
Exceptional
47.8%
Exceptional
47.8%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.0%
Exceptional
11.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
33.3%
Exceptional
27.4%

Celtic vs Turkish Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Celtic and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 44.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 21.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.1% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 4.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 9.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 17.5%).
Celtic vs Turkish Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCelticTurkish
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.1%
Tragic
11.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.1%
Tragic
88.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.2%
Poor
54.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.7%
Tragic
18.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.1%
Tragic
5.8%

Celtic vs Turkish Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Celtic and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 41.4%), professional degree (4.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 41.3%), and master's degree (14.8% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 34.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (95.0% compared to 95.0%, a difference of 0.040%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.21%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.21%).
Celtic vs Turkish Education Level
Education Level MetricCelticTurkish
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Exceptional
1.8%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
97.7%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
97.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Exceptional
96.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.0%
Exceptional
95.8%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.0%
Exceptional
95.0%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.7%
Exceptional
94.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.3%
Exceptional
93.0%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.6%
Exceptional
91.2%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
86.7%
Exceptional
88.5%
College, Under 1 year
Good
65.9%
Exceptional
70.7%
College, 1 year or more
Average
59.4%
Exceptional
65.5%
Associate's Degree
Fair
45.8%
Exceptional
53.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Fair
37.0%
Exceptional
46.2%
Master's Degree
Average
14.8%
Exceptional
19.9%
Professional Degree
Average
4.4%
Exceptional
6.2%
Doctorate Degree
Good
1.9%
Exceptional
2.7%

Celtic vs Turkish Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Celtic and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 48.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.9% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 33.2%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 32.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 1.3%), disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 3.5%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 14.0%).
Celtic vs Turkish Disability
Disability MetricCelticTurkish
Disability
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
10.7%
Males
Tragic
13.0%
Exceptional
10.3%
Females
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
11.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.7%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.6%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
9.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
24.2%
Exceptional
21.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Average
47.2%
Exceptional
45.7%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Exceptional
1.9%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Good
17.1%
Exceptional
16.9%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.7%
Exceptional
5.5%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.2%