Guatemalan vs Turkish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 237,383,009 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Turks within Guatemalan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.241. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Guatemalans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Turks. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Guatemalans corresponds to a decrease of 2.5 Turks.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,766 compared to $52,391, a difference of 38.7%), median male earnings ($46,736 compared to $64,253, a difference of 37.5%), and median family income ($88,295 compared to $121,202, a difference of 37.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,525 compared to $54,266, a difference of 5.3%), wage/income gap (22.6% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 22.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,526 compared to $68,037, a difference of 24.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.0% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 63.1%), child poverty under the age of 16 (21.2% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 58.3%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (21.4% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 56.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.6% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 5.6%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 6.2%), and single male poverty (13.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 13.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 25.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 23.0%), and female unemployment (6.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 2.0%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 2.2%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (81.2% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 3.2%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.0% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (35.5% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 0.23%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 0.82%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 50.0%), single mother households (7.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 40.0%), and births to unmarried women (37.1% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 35.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.2% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 2.5%), family households with children (28.9% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 5.3%), and average family size (3.40 compared to 3.16, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 19.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 8.8%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 0.35%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 0.85%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 93.5%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 88.9%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 78.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.7%), kindergarten (96.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and 1st grade (96.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 23.1%), disability age 65 to 74 (25.5% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 21.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 0.070%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 3.0%), and cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 4.9%).