French American Indian vs Immigrants from Grenada Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 37,581,843 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Grenada within French American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.073. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French American Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.005% in Immigrants from Grenada. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French American Indians corresponds to an increase of 4.7 Immigrants from Grenada.

When considering income, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.4% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 56.8%), median female earnings ($36,920 compared to $41,932, a difference of 13.6%), and householder income under 25 years ($48,977 compared to $54,538, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($76,387 compared to $76,517, a difference of 0.17%), median male earnings ($50,611 compared to $50,279, a difference of 0.66%), and per capita income ($40,244 compared to $41,123, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 38.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 37.4%), and married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 33.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (20.8% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 0.78%), single father poverty (17.4% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 3.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.3% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.3% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 40.6%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.7% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 35.4%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 30.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 2.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.8% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 56.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.8% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 14.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.2% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.12%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.8% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 0.24%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 28.1%), single mother households (6.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 18.6%), and married-couple households (44.1% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.4% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 0.33%), births to unmarried women (36.6% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 0.82%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.34, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 259.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 149.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 121.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 62.7%, a difference of 43.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.5% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 93.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 121.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 30.4%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 15.1%), and master's degree (12.7% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of professional degree (3.8% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 0.47%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.78%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.80%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 64.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 53.3%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 0.94%, a difference of 40.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.9% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 0.010%), cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 0.070%), and disability age over 75 (48.3% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 0.84%).