French Canadian vs Immigrants from Grenada Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 63,221,444 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Grenada within French Canadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.238. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French Canadians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.037% in Immigrants from Grenada. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French Canadians corresponds to an increase of 37.2 Immigrants from Grenada.

When considering income, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 73.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($99,093 compared to $85,552, a difference of 15.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($57,975 compared to $50,747, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($46,026 compared to $45,596, a difference of 0.94%), householder income under 25 years ($52,672 compared to $54,538, a difference of 3.5%), and per capita income ($43,003 compared to $41,123, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.2% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 71.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.8% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 60.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 56.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (30.8% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 1.6%), single female poverty (22.2% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.3% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (11.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 67.6%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.8% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 53.1%), and male unemployment (5.1% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 47.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.83%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 10.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 71.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.1% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 16.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.0% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 0.59%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 34.9%), married-couple households (47.5% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 26.8%), and currently married (48.0% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.7% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 1.7%), family households with children (26.1% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 3.8%), and births to unmarried women (34.4% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 377.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 141.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 126.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 62.7%, a difference of 47.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 105.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 126.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 83.7%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 30.1%), and college, under 1 year (64.2% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of master's degree (14.1% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 0.92%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and kindergarten (98.6% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 0.94%, a difference of 99.0%), hearing disability (3.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 73.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 51.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (23.7% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 0.15%), disability age over 75 (47.0% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 3.1%).