Immigrants from Sudan vs Immigrants from Grenada Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 39,148,489 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Grenada within Immigrant from Sudan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.389. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Sudan within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.076% in Immigrants from Grenada. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Sudan corresponds to an increase of 1,075.7 Immigrants from Grenada.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sudan and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (23.6% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 46.2%), householder income over 65 years ($59,248 compared to $50,747, a difference of 16.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($46,791 compared to $54,538, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($44,767 compared to $45,596, a difference of 1.8%), per capita income ($41,986 compared to $41,123, a difference of 2.1%), and median male earnings ($51,489 compared to $50,279, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sudan and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 47.8%), receiving food stamps (12.1% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 46.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 44.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (30.1% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 0.79%), single male poverty (12.7% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 2.0%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sudan and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.0% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 60.7%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.5% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 50.0%), and male unemployment (5.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 49.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 5.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 6.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 10.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sudan and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.0% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 61.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.8% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 14.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.7% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sudan and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 18.5%), single mother households (6.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 18.4%), and married-couple households (41.9% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 3.3%), average family size (3.22 compared to 3.34, a difference of 3.9%), and family households (60.2% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sudan and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 260.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 101.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 93.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 62.7%, a difference of 43.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 84.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 93.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sudan and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 57.4%), professional degree (4.9% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 30.7%), and no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.5% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.50%), nursery school (97.7% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.51%), and kindergarten (97.7% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sudan and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 0.94%, a difference of 35.7%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 30.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.070%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.8% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 0.17%), and disability age over 75 (47.5% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 0.84%).