Immigrants from Congo vs Immigrants from Grenada Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 33,544,440 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Grenada within Immigrant from Congo communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.159. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Congo within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.048% in Immigrants from Grenada. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Congo corresponds to an increase of 48.3 Immigrants from Grenada.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (21.7% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 34.1%), householder income under 25 years ($43,266 compared to $54,538, a difference of 26.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($72,178 compared to $88,311, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($51,393 compared to $50,747, a difference of 1.3%), median family income ($82,216 compared to $89,249, a difference of 8.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($77,850 compared to $85,552, a difference of 9.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 43.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.7% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 34.9%), and receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 25.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (14.7% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 0.12%), poverty (16.1% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 2.2%), and female poverty (17.4% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.3% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 58.3%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.2% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 50.0%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.9% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 45.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 0.94%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 4.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.7% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 64.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 15.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.19%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 0.66%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 26.2%), divorced or separated (13.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 12.9%), and family households with children (27.3% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (8.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 0.45%), births to unmarried women (36.8% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.34, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 272.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 91.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 86.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 62.7%, a difference of 43.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.1% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 81.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 86.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 16.3%), no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 15.3%), and master's degree (12.6% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (97.0% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.33%), 3rd grade (97.3% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.34%), and nursery school (97.6% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.37%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 33.6%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 32.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.3% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 1.7%), female disability (12.7% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 2.5%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 4.7%).