Celtic vs Immigrants from Grenada Community Comparison

COMPARE

Celtic
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Grenada
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Celtics

Immigrants from Grenada

Average
Poor
5,342
SOCIAL INDEX
50.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
179th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,656
SOCIAL INDEX
14.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
293rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Grenada Integration in Celtic Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 40,463,538 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Grenada within Celtic communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.721. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Celtics within a typical geography, there is an increase of 3.249% in Immigrants from Grenada. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Celtics corresponds to an increase of 3,249.1 Immigrants from Grenada.
Celtic Integration in Immigrants from Grenada Communities

Celtic vs Immigrants from Grenada Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 68.6%), householder income over 65 years ($60,608 compared to $50,747, a difference of 19.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($98,896 compared to $85,552, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($45,732 compared to $45,596, a difference of 0.30%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($92,241 compared to $88,311, a difference of 4.4%), and per capita income ($43,621 compared to $41,123, a difference of 6.1%).
Celtic vs Immigrants from Grenada Income
Income MetricCelticImmigrants from Grenada
Per Capita Income
Average
$43,621
Tragic
$41,123
Median Family Income
Fair
$101,139
Tragic
$89,249
Median Household Income
Fair
$83,193
Tragic
$76,517
Median Earnings
Fair
$45,732
Fair
$45,596
Median Male Earnings
Average
$54,242
Tragic
$50,279
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$38,283
Exceptional
$41,932
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,447
Exceptional
$54,538
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Fair
$92,241
Tragic
$88,311
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Fair
$98,896
Tragic
$85,552
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$60,608
Tragic
$50,747
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.3%
Exceptional
16.2%

Celtic vs Immigrants from Grenada Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.9% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 62.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.0% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 62.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.8% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 61.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.5% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 1.5%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.6% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and single mother poverty (30.9% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 2.0%).
Celtic vs Immigrants from Grenada Poverty
Poverty MetricCelticImmigrants from Grenada
Poverty
Average
12.3%
Tragic
15.8%
Families
Good
8.8%
Tragic
12.4%
Males
Average
11.2%
Tragic
14.7%
Females
Average
13.4%
Tragic
16.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.6%
Tragic
21.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.5%
Tragic
14.7%
Children Under 5 years
Poor
17.9%
Tragic
20.7%
Children Under 16 years
Fair
16.4%
Tragic
21.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Average
16.6%
Tragic
21.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Fair
17.0%
Tragic
20.7%
Single Males
Tragic
14.5%
Fair
13.0%
Single Females
Tragic
22.7%
Tragic
21.8%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.5%
Tragic
16.9%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.9%
Tragic
30.3%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
7.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Tragic
15.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
17.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
10.9%
Tragic
17.8%

Celtic vs Immigrants from Grenada Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (5.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 51.0%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 46.4%), and unemployment (4.9% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 41.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 6.9%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 8.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.3% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 9.2%).
Celtic vs Immigrants from Grenada Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCelticImmigrants from Grenada
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
6.9%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
7.6%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
6.3%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
15.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.6%
Tragic
25.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Tragic
13.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
8.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.4%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Good
4.7%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Excellent
4.4%
Tragic
5.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.1%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
5.3%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.4%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
6.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.3%
Average
7.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.5%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.4%
Tragic
6.3%

Celtic vs Immigrants from Grenada Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.3% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 62.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 14.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (63.8% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 0.32%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.52%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.69%).
Celtic vs Immigrants from Grenada Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCelticImmigrants from Grenada
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.8%
Tragic
63.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.7%
Tragic
77.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
41.3%
Tragic
25.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.1%
Tragic
67.2%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Average
84.7%
Tragic
82.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.1%
Tragic
83.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.8%
Tragic
83.3%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.8%
Tragic
81.0%

Celtic vs Immigrants from Grenada Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 32.9%), married-couple households (47.3% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 26.2%), and currently married (47.8% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.8% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 1.8%), family households with children (26.6% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 5.8%), and average family size (3.11 compared to 3.34, a difference of 7.3%).
Celtic vs Immigrants from Grenada Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCelticImmigrants from Grenada
Family Households
Tragic
63.8%
Tragic
62.6%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.6%
Tragic
25.2%
Married-couple Households
Excellent
47.3%
Tragic
37.5%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.11
Exceptional
3.34
Single Father Households
Average
2.3%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Good
6.1%
Tragic
8.2%
Currently Married
Exceptional
47.8%
Tragic
39.1%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.0%
Good
11.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
33.3%
Tragic
36.3%

Celtic vs Immigrants from Grenada Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 364.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 159.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 138.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.1% compared to 62.7%, a difference of 46.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 106.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 138.4%).
Celtic vs Immigrants from Grenada Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCelticImmigrants from Grenada
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.1%
Tragic
37.5%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.1%
Tragic
62.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.2%
Tragic
28.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.7%
Tragic
9.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.1%
Tragic
2.7%

Celtic vs Immigrants from Grenada Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 68.8%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 37.6%), and professional degree (4.4% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.3%).
Celtic vs Immigrants from Grenada Education Level
Education Level MetricCelticImmigrants from Grenada
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Tragic
2.8%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.2%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.1%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.0%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
96.7%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
96.5%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Tragic
95.9%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Tragic
94.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Tragic
94.3%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.0%
Tragic
93.0%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.0%
Tragic
91.6%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.7%
Tragic
90.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.3%
Tragic
88.4%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.6%
Tragic
85.6%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
86.7%
Tragic
81.3%
College, Under 1 year
Good
65.9%
Tragic
59.1%
College, 1 year or more
Average
59.4%
Tragic
54.4%
Associate's Degree
Fair
45.8%
Tragic
42.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Fair
37.0%
Tragic
35.0%
Master's Degree
Average
14.8%
Poor
14.0%
Professional Degree
Average
4.4%
Tragic
3.7%
Doctorate Degree
Good
1.9%
Tragic
1.4%

Celtic vs Immigrants from Grenada Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 0.94%, a difference of 77.3%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 69.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 42.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 1.5%), disability age 65 to 74 (24.2% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 2.0%), and ambulatory disability (6.7% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 3.3%).
Celtic vs Immigrants from Grenada Disability
Disability MetricCelticImmigrants from Grenada
Disability
Tragic
13.1%
Excellent
11.5%
Males
Tragic
13.0%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Tragic
13.3%
Fair
12.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.7%
Exceptional
0.94%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
5.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.6%
Exceptional
5.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.9%
Good
11.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
24.2%
Fair
23.8%
Age | Over 75 years
Average
47.2%
Tragic
47.9%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Fair
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Exceptional
2.2%
Cognitive
Good
17.1%
Tragic
17.9%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.7%
Tragic
6.9%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.8%