Immigrants from Ghana vs Immigrants from Grenada Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 51,507,599 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Grenada within Immigrant from Ghana communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.066. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Ghana within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.012% in Immigrants from Grenada. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Ghana corresponds to a decrease of 11.6 Immigrants from Grenada.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.3% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 38.0%), householder income over 65 years ($58,624 compared to $50,747, a difference of 15.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($94,982 compared to $85,552, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($41,131 compared to $41,123, a difference of 0.020%), median earnings ($45,641 compared to $45,596, a difference of 0.10%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($87,760 compared to $88,311, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 26.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.4% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 24.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.8% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.7% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 0.12%), single female poverty (21.9% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 0.52%), and single father poverty (16.7% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 0.91%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 38.3%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (19.8% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 30.0%), and male unemployment (6.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.37%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.52%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.4% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 39.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 11.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 21.6%), family households with children (28.6% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 13.5%), and married-couple households (41.8% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.4% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 1.2%), average family size (3.29 compared to 3.34, a difference of 1.7%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (16.6% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 125.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 89.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 77.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (83.4% compared to 62.7%, a difference of 33.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (47.4% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 65.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 77.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 28.7%), professional degree (4.1% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 8.6%), and master's degree (15.0% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.4% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.17%), 3rd grade (97.2% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.17%), and kindergarten (97.4% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 0.94%, a difference of 29.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 24.5%), and hearing disability (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.7% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 0.46%), female disability (12.2% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 0.99%), and disability (11.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.0%).