Immigrants from Turkey vs Immigrants from Grenada Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 51,956,630 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Grenada within Immigrant from Turkey communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.635. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Turkey within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.509% in Immigrants from Grenada. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Turkey corresponds to an increase of 509.1 Immigrants from Grenada.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Turkey and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 66.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($114,407 compared to $85,552, a difference of 33.7%), and median family income ($118,325 compared to $89,249, a difference of 32.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,503 compared to $54,538, a difference of 3.9%), median female earnings ($44,066 compared to $41,932, a difference of 5.1%), and median earnings ($52,960 compared to $45,596, a difference of 16.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Turkey and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 81.6%), married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 59.5%), and family poverty (8.0% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 54.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.5% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 3.5%), single male poverty (12.1% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 7.2%), and single father poverty (15.3% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 10.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Turkey and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (5.1% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 48.8%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 46.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 41.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 4.9%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 7.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 9.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Turkey and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 37.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 9.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Turkey and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 43.6%), births to unmarried women (28.1% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 29.0%), and married-couple households (46.8% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.38%), family households (63.1% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 0.68%), and average family size (3.18 compared to 3.34, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Turkey and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 227.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 106.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 96.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 62.7%, a difference of 41.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.6% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 86.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 96.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Turkey and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 92.9%), professional degree (6.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 64.8%), and no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 42.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.87%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.88%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.89%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Turkey and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 27.4%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 25.9%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (10.2% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 2.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.2%), and cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 3.8%).