Alaska Native vs Immigrants from Grenada Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 30,422,930 people shows a near-perfect negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Grenada within Alaska Native communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.924. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alaska Natives within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.019% in Immigrants from Grenada. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alaska Natives corresponds to a decrease of 18.6 Immigrants from Grenada.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.4% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 51.1%), householder income over 65 years ($60,748 compared to $50,747, a difference of 19.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($93,991 compared to $85,552, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($88,018 compared to $88,311, a difference of 0.33%), householder income under 25 years ($54,000 compared to $54,538, a difference of 1.0%), and median male earnings ($49,711 compared to $50,279, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 56.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.8% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 46.0%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (16.8% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 26.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.5% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 1.6%), single mother poverty (30.9% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 1.9%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (19.6% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (14.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 119.9%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (7.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 29.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 26.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (6.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 4.6%), unemployment (7.2% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 4.7%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (13.2% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 53.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 13.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.3% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (77.0% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 0.84%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 0.92%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.6% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 74.8%), married-couple households (45.6% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 21.6%), and family households with children (29.9% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.37 compared to 3.34, a difference of 1.0%), family households (65.1% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 3.9%), and divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 168.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 130.9%), and no vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 115.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (83.8% compared to 62.7%, a difference of 33.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.6% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 86.9%), and no vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 115.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 86.9%), master's degree (11.6% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 20.3%), and bachelor's degree (29.4% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.8% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.5%), kindergarten (98.7% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1st grade (98.7% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.9% compared to 0.94%, a difference of 211.6%), hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 104.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 46.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 2.0%), female disability (12.8% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 3.5%), and disability age over 75 (52.8% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 10.1%).