Immigrants from Poland vs Immigrants from Grenada Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 57,599,607 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Grenada within Immigrant from Poland communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.081. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Poland within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Immigrants from Grenada. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Poland corresponds to an increase of 0.9 Immigrants from Grenada.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 65.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,319 compared to $85,552, a difference of 24.3%), and median family income ($108,570 compared to $89,249, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,630 compared to $41,932, a difference of 0.73%), householder income under 25 years ($55,474 compared to $54,538, a difference of 1.7%), and median earnings ($49,633 compared to $45,596, a difference of 8.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.6% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 67.5%), married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 58.2%), and family poverty (7.9% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 57.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.7% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 7.3%), single male poverty (11.5% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 12.6%), and single mother poverty (26.9% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 12.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.0% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 51.1%), male unemployment (5.3% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 42.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 38.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 2.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 47.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 13.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.6% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 2.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 41.8%), married-couple households (48.1% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 28.2%), and births to unmarried women (28.9% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 25.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.60%), family households (65.2% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 4.1%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.34, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.6% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 254.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 112.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 104.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.5% compared to 62.7%, a difference of 42.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.6% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 90.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 104.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 32.7%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 21.8%), and professional degree (4.3% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.72%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.73%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.73%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 0.94%, a difference of 35.0%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 33.9%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (10.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 1.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.0%), and disability (11.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 3.4%).