White/Caucasian vs Immigrants from Grenada Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 66,805,320 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Grenada within White/Caucasian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.235. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Whites/Caucasians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Immigrants from Grenada. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Whites/Caucasians corresponds to a decrease of 1.0 Immigrants from Grenada.

When considering income, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.5% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 76.3%), householder income over 65 years ($58,847 compared to $50,747, a difference of 16.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($98,091 compared to $85,552, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($45,197 compared to $45,596, a difference of 0.88%), per capita income ($42,180 compared to $41,123, a difference of 2.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,668 compared to $88,311, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.1% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 60.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 57.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 56.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.7% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 0.56%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 2.0%), and single mother poverty (31.2% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.8% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 53.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 50.9%), and male unemployment (5.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 50.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 6.3%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 7.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 10.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.3% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 62.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 14.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.6% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.35%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.9% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.50%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 33.5%), married-couple households (48.6% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 29.6%), and currently married (48.6% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.1% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 3.9%), divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 5.9%), and average family size (3.14 compared to 3.34, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 432.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 169.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 148.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.1% compared to 62.7%, a difference of 48.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.8% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 112.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 148.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 69.0%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 28.2%), and professional degree (4.1% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of bachelor's degree (35.3% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 0.84%), master's degree (13.8% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 1.0%), and nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 0.94%, a difference of 75.9%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 68.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 43.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.3% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 1.3%), disability age 65 to 74 (24.2% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 2.0%), and ambulatory disability (6.7% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 3.7%).