Fijian vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,477,848 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong within Fijian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.735. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Fijians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.067% in Immigrants from Hong Kong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Fijians corresponds to an increase of 66.8 Immigrants from Hong Kong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($79,956 compared to $128,140, a difference of 60.3%), per capita income ($36,690 compared to $56,709, a difference of 54.6%), and median male earnings ($45,607 compared to $70,146, a difference of 53.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 11.4%), householder income under 25 years ($50,132 compared to $62,083, a difference of 23.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,768 compared to $71,567, a difference of 26.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (19.9% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 60.1%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 53.1%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (18.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 51.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 3.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 9.0%), and single father poverty (15.7% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 10.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 60.0%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (3.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 33.4%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.27%), male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.94%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 32.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 8.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.2% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.4% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 63.9%), single mother households (7.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 48.8%), and births to unmarried women (32.3% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 36.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 0.36%), average family size (3.36 compared to 3.26, a difference of 3.1%), and family households with children (29.0% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 20.7%), no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 18.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 2.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 9.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 16.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 145.8%), professional degree (2.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 119.0%), and master's degree (10.3% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 98.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (96.9% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.060%), 5th grade (96.6% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.070%), and 6th grade (96.2% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 0.12%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 61.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 37.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.0% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 36.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.0% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 5.6%), cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 10.4%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 12.8%).