Central American vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 249,058,904 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong within Central American communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.417. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Central Americans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Immigrants from Hong Kong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Central Americans corresponds to a decrease of 3.7 Immigrants from Hong Kong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Central American and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($85,144 compared to $128,140, a difference of 50.5%), per capita income ($38,560 compared to $56,709, a difference of 47.1%), and median male earnings ($48,093 compared to $70,146, a difference of 45.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (23.1% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 10.5%), householder income under 25 years ($52,626 compared to $62,083, a difference of 18.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,321 compared to $71,567, a difference of 27.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Central American and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (20.6% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 65.7%), child poverty under the age of 16 (20.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 65.1%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (20.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 64.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.0% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 12.0%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.9% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 14.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.7% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 14.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Central American and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 41.5%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 32.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 30.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.16%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 0.97%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Central American and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 14.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.7% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.54%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Central American and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 57.3%), single father households (2.9% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 55.8%), and births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 55.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.0% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 0.21%), average family size (3.41 compared to 3.26, a difference of 4.7%), and family households with children (29.1% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Central American and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 9.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 6.8%), and no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 0.55%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 4.0%), and no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Central American and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 90.5%), professional degree (3.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 78.8%), and master's degree (12.2% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 67.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.6% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.75%), kindergarten (96.6% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.75%), and 1st grade (96.5% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.76%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Central American and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 36.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 28.0%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 2.7%), disability age over 75 (48.8% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 5.0%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 6.1%).