U.S. Virgin Islander vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 67,691,295 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong within U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.038. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in U.S. Virgin Islanders within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.009% in Immigrants from Hong Kong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 U.S. Virgin Islanders corresponds to an increase of 9.4 Immigrants from Hong Kong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($78,911 compared to $128,140, a difference of 62.4%), median household income ($71,853 compared to $111,519, a difference of 55.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,736 compared to $127,500, a difference of 54.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (21.5% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 18.5%), householder income under 25 years ($47,448 compared to $62,083, a difference of 30.8%), and median female earnings ($36,424 compared to $49,818, a difference of 36.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (23.0% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 85.0%), receiving food stamps (16.5% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 81.9%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (22.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 80.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.4% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 19.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.0% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 26.9%), and single father poverty (18.1% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 27.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 50.4%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 42.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 34.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 5.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.6% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 10.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.2% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.4% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 78.1%), births to unmarried women (39.6% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 67.9%), and divorced or separated (13.4% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 34.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.29 compared to 3.26, a difference of 1.1%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and family households (62.6% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 39.5%), no vehicles in household (15.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 36.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.4% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 24.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.6% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 4.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (47.5% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 10.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.4% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 24.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 87.6%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 74.9%), and master's degree (13.1% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 56.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (94.0% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.11%), 8th grade (95.0% compared to 94.9%, a difference of 0.14%), and 6th grade (96.5% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 0.15%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 56.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 45.8%), and vision disability (2.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 35.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.9% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 5.3%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 5.9%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 11.7%).