Immigrants from Taiwan vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 211,392,355 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong within Immigrant from Taiwan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.745. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Taiwan within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.254% in Immigrants from Hong Kong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Taiwan corresponds to an increase of 254.0 Immigrants from Hong Kong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (29.5% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 15.4%), householder income over 65 years ($77,051 compared to $71,567, a difference of 7.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($135,508 compared to $127,500, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($129,122 compared to $128,140, a difference of 0.77%), median female earnings ($49,256 compared to $49,818, a difference of 1.1%), and per capita income ($57,742 compared to $56,709, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (7.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 24.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.7% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 14.6%), and married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (16.4% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 1.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.3% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and single male poverty (10.3% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.8% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 10.0%), male unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 10.0%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.0% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.53%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.65%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.83%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 0.62%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (71.5% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 0.16%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.18%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in married-couple households (52.4% compared to 49.6%, a difference of 5.6%), family households with children (29.0% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 5.4%), and currently married (50.7% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (1.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 0.37%), average family size (3.24 compared to 3.26, a difference of 0.59%), and divorced or separated (9.8% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 46.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 16.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.1% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 4.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.7% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 13.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.1% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 15.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 28.0%), doctorate degree (3.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 15.2%), and professional degree (7.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.58%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.59%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.60%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (4.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 8.2%), self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 8.0%), and vision disability (1.7% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 0.96%), cognitive disability (15.7% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 1.9%), and disability age over 75 (45.5% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 2.1%).