Immigrants from Mexico vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 246,833,550 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong within Immigrant from Mexico communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.603. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Mexico within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Immigrants from Hong Kong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Mexico corresponds to a decrease of 4.3 Immigrants from Hong Kong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($33,931 compared to $56,709, a difference of 67.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($78,809 compared to $128,140, a difference of 62.6%), and median family income ($83,639 compared to $131,067, a difference of 56.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 1.0%), householder income under 25 years ($50,422 compared to $62,083, a difference of 23.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($52,801 compared to $71,567, a difference of 35.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (22.2% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 78.9%), child poverty under the age of 16 (21.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 76.7%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (21.6% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 75.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.0% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 12.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 16.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.9% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 16.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 56.6%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 40.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.5% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.7% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 2.5%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 4.1%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.1% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 15.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.7% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 68.8%), single father households (3.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 65.9%), and births to unmarried women (37.5% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 59.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (69.1% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 4.5%), married-couple households (46.4% compared to 49.6%, a difference of 6.9%), and average family size (3.52 compared to 3.26, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 39.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 38.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.6% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 28.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 3.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 14.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.6% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 28.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 151.0%), professional degree (2.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 142.4%), and master's degree (9.3% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 119.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.0%), kindergarten (96.4% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.0%), and 1st grade (96.3% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 47.9%), vision disability (2.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 39.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.1% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 36.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.1% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 10.0%), cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 10.9%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 11.5%).