Salvadoran vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 227,259,650 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong within Salvadoran communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.320. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Salvadorans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.006% in Immigrants from Hong Kong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Salvadorans corresponds to a decrease of 5.7 Immigrants from Hong Kong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Salvadoran and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($38,858 compared to $56,709, a difference of 45.9%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($88,198 compared to $128,140, a difference of 45.3%), and median male earnings ($48,646 compared to $70,146, a difference of 44.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (23.0% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 11.0%), householder income under 25 years ($55,412 compared to $62,083, a difference of 12.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($59,141 compared to $71,567, a difference of 21.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Salvadoran and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (19.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 57.4%), child poverty among girls under 16 (19.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 57.2%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (19.5% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 56.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.9% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 4.5%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 9.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.2% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 10.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Salvadoran and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 38.4%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 32.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 27.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.7% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Salvadoran and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.5% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 13.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.8% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Salvadoran and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.9% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 58.8%), single mother households (7.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 55.8%), and births to unmarried women (36.0% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 52.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (67.2% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 1.5%), average family size (3.48 compared to 3.26, a difference of 6.7%), and family households with children (29.9% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Salvadoran and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 20.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 13.8%), and no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 1.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.3% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 7.1%), and no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 12.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Salvadoran and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 87.8%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 81.6%), and master's degree (12.2% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 68.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.0%), kindergarten (96.3% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.0%), and 1st grade (96.3% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Salvadoran and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 30.8%), disability age 65 to 74 (25.0% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 25.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 2.0%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 3.9%), and disability age over 75 (48.9% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 5.2%).