Immigrants from Poland vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 199,381,322 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong within Immigrant from Poland communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.034. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Poland within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Immigrants from Hong Kong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Poland corresponds to a decrease of 2.1 Immigrants from Hong Kong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($101,065 compared to $128,140, a difference of 26.8%), per capita income ($45,979 compared to $56,709, a difference of 23.3%), and median household income ($90,549 compared to $111,519, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 4.8%), householder income under 25 years ($55,474 compared to $62,083, a difference of 11.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,041 compared to $71,567, a difference of 17.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.1% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 21.6%), child poverty among boys under 16 (14.7% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 19.7%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.6% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.1% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 2.0%), male poverty (9.8% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 2.1%), and married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 34.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 22.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.050%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.49%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.72%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 22.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 6.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.61%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.040%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.20%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.9% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 22.6%), single mother households (5.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 18.9%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.2% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 1.3%), family households (65.2% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and currently married (48.1% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 11.6%), no vehicles in household (10.6% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 7.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.6% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.5% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 0.86%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 3.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.6% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 66.2%), professional degree (4.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 50.3%), and master's degree (15.4% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 33.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (89.5% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.24%), 12th grade, no diploma (91.6% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 0.30%), and 11th grade (92.8% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 0.61%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 0.95%, a difference of 34.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 22.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.1% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 0.74%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.83%), and disability age over 75 (45.4% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 2.4%).