South American Indian vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 126,592,921 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong within South American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.102. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in South American Indians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.014% in Immigrants from Hong Kong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 South American Indians corresponds to a decrease of 13.8 Immigrants from Hong Kong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($96,497 compared to $128,140, a difference of 32.8%), median male earnings ($54,508 compared to $70,146, a difference of 28.7%), and per capita income ($44,206 compared to $56,709, a difference of 28.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 3.2%), householder income over 65 years ($62,215 compared to $71,567, a difference of 15.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($52,979 compared to $62,083, a difference of 17.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (17.4% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 39.9%), child poverty among girls under 16 (16.8% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 35.9%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (16.5% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 35.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 0.36%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 3.2%), and single father poverty (15.7% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 10.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 37.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 25.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.2%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 3.2%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.8% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 17.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.50%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.67%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 0.68%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.7% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 34.6%), single mother households (6.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 33.0%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.26 compared to 3.26, a difference of 0.15%), family households with children (28.0% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and family households (64.6% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.1% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 6.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 3.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 0.29%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.0% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 0.80%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 40.5%), professional degree (4.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 34.7%), and master's degree (15.9% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 28.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.1% compared to 93.1%, a difference of 0.040%), 9th grade (94.3% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.14%), and 8th grade (95.1% compared to 94.9%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 0.95%, a difference of 40.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 33.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 27.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.84%), disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 7.6%).