Pima vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 53,161,490 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.391. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.010% in Immigrants from Hong Kong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to a decrease of 10.2 Immigrants from Hong Kong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $56,709, a difference of 85.1%), median household income ($63,262 compared to $111,519, a difference of 76.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $127,500, a difference of 73.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $62,083, a difference of 20.5%), wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 20.9%), and median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $49,818, a difference of 41.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (18.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 153.2%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (25.3% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 143.8%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (29.7% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 142.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 3.6%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 58.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 62.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 167.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 162.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 149.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 8.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 20.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 22.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 16.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 14.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 3.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 8.6%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 11.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 127.9%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 118.4%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 71.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 0.31%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 1.6%), and average family size (3.75 compared to 3.26, a difference of 15.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 25.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 21.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 1.1%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 2.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 15.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.2% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 121.2%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 110.4%), and bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 107.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (93.9% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.20%), 8th grade (95.6% compared to 94.9%, a difference of 0.75%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.91%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 96.9%), disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 94.4%), and vision disability (3.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 84.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 0.95%, a difference of 12.1%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 16.4%), and cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 17.3%).