Scandinavian vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 235,948,604 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong within Scandinavian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.565. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Scandinavians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.103% in Immigrants from Hong Kong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Scandinavians corresponds to an increase of 103.2 Immigrants from Hong Kong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,596 compared to $128,140, a difference of 34.0%), median female earnings ($38,306 compared to $49,818, a difference of 30.0%), and median household income ($86,073 compared to $111,519, a difference of 29.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (29.1% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 14.0%), householder income over 65 years ($61,586 compared to $71,567, a difference of 16.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($52,654 compared to $62,083, a difference of 17.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (21.1% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 27.5%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 26.3%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (15.7% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 26.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (7.6% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 5.0%), male poverty (10.1% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 5.8%), and poverty (11.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 28.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 27.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.080%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 43.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.5% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 9.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.15%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.75%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 0.88%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 29.9%), births to unmarried women (29.8% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 26.3%), and divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (49.6% compared to 49.6%, a difference of 0.17%), currently married (49.5% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 1.2%), and family households with children (28.0% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 61.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.6% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 23.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.1% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 4.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (62.1% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 18.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 23.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 80.2%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 51.3%), and professional degree (4.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 51.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (87.9% compared to 86.9%, a difference of 1.1%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and kindergarten (98.6% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 0.95%, a difference of 63.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 47.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 44.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.070%), disability age over 75 (46.6% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 0.34%), and cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 5.7%).