Uruguayan vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,375,082 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong within Uruguayan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.162. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Uruguayans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.038% in Immigrants from Hong Kong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Uruguayans corresponds to an increase of 37.7 Immigrants from Hong Kong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($93,631 compared to $128,140, a difference of 36.9%), median household income ($84,691 compared to $111,519, a difference of 31.7%), and median male earnings ($53,680 compared to $70,146, a difference of 30.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.2% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 1.5%), householder income under 25 years ($52,465 compared to $62,083, a difference of 18.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($59,090 compared to $71,567, a difference of 21.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (17.0% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 37.1%), child poverty among boys under 16 (16.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 34.1%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (16.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 32.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.5% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 5.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.8% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 7.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 9.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 29.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 29.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 25.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.5% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 0.27%), unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 14.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.9% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.16%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.29%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.1% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 40.4%), single mother households (6.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 35.9%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 29.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 0.54%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.26, a difference of 0.77%), and family households (64.5% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 15.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 7.6%), and no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.22%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.8% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 0.050%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.7% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 0.18%), and no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.22%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 56.8%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 38.4%), and master's degree (15.3% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 34.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (94.1% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.0%), 8th grade (95.1% compared to 94.9%, a difference of 0.19%), and 10th grade (92.9% compared to 93.1%, a difference of 0.19%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 30.3%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 0.95%, a difference of 28.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.29%), disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 0.48%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 4.3%).