Apache vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Community Comparison

COMPARE

Apache
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Apache

Immigrants from Hong Kong

Poor
Good
1,423
SOCIAL INDEX
11.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
309th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,848
SOCIAL INDEX
76.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
102nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Hong Kong Integration in Apache Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 148,348,027 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong within Apache communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.654. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Apache within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.140% in Immigrants from Hong Kong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Apache corresponds to an increase of 140.2 Immigrants from Hong Kong.
Apache Integration in Immigrants from Hong Kong Communities

Apache vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Apache and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($34,886 compared to $56,709, a difference of 62.6%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,260 compared to $128,140, a difference of 59.7%), and median household income ($70,927 compared to $111,519, a difference of 57.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.5% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 4.0%), householder income under 25 years ($49,395 compared to $62,083, a difference of 25.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,668 compared to $71,567, a difference of 30.9%).
Apache vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Income
Income MetricApacheImmigrants from Hong Kong
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$34,886
Exceptional
$56,709
Median Family Income
Tragic
$84,451
Exceptional
$131,067
Median Household Income
Tragic
$70,927
Exceptional
$111,519
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,388
Exceptional
$59,433
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$46,429
Exceptional
$70,146
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,895
Exceptional
$49,818
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$49,395
Exceptional
$62,083
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$80,260
Exceptional
$128,140
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$82,184
Exceptional
$127,500
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,668
Exceptional
$71,567
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
24.5%
Good
25.5%

Apache vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Apache and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (21.6% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 106.5%), family poverty (14.7% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 103.2%), and receiving food stamps (18.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 101.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.3% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 18.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.9% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 25.6%), and single mother poverty (36.6% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 50.2%).
Apache vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Poverty
Poverty MetricApacheImmigrants from Hong Kong
Poverty
Tragic
18.4%
Exceptional
10.4%
Families
Tragic
14.7%
Exceptional
7.3%
Males
Tragic
17.7%
Exceptional
9.6%
Females
Tragic
19.2%
Exceptional
11.2%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
26.3%
Exceptional
17.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
20.1%
Exceptional
10.4%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
25.0%
Exceptional
12.4%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
23.8%
Exceptional
12.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
24.5%
Exceptional
12.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
23.8%
Exceptional
12.3%
Single Males
Tragic
21.6%
Exceptional
10.4%
Single Females
Tragic
27.7%
Exceptional
16.5%
Single Fathers
Tragic
24.2%
Exceptional
14.2%
Single Mothers
Tragic
36.6%
Exceptional
24.4%
Married Couples
Tragic
9.0%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
13.9%
Fair
11.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
15.3%
Tragic
12.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
18.3%
Exceptional
9.1%

Apache vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Apache and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (12.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 112.9%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 91.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (7.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 68.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.3%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 5.0%).
Apache vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Unemployment
Unemployment MetricApacheImmigrants from Hong Kong
Unemployment
Tragic
7.4%
Good
5.2%
Males
Tragic
8.6%
Good
5.2%
Females
Tragic
6.6%
Excellent
5.1%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.5%
Average
11.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
18.8%
Good
17.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.0%
Poor
10.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
9.5%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
8.4%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
7.0%
Average
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.3%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
6.0%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.5%
Excellent
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.3%
Good
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.4%
Exceptional
7.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
12.3%
Exceptional
5.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.7%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
7.9%
Exceptional
4.7%

Apache vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Apache and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 16.9%), in labor force | age 35-44 (77.9% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 9.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (73.7% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (72.0% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 0.52%), in labor force | age 25-29 (79.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 7.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (60.7% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 8.3%).
Apache vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricApacheImmigrants from Hong Kong
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
60.7%
Exceptional
65.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
73.7%
Exceptional
80.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Poor
35.6%
Tragic
30.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
72.0%
Tragic
71.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
79.2%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
79.0%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
77.9%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
77.1%
Exceptional
83.6%

Apache vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Apache and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (39.9% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 69.1%), single mother households (7.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 63.0%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 54.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.5% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 0.60%), family households with children (29.0% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 5.2%), and average family size (3.46 compared to 3.26, a difference of 6.3%).
Apache vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Family Structure
Family Structure MetricApacheImmigrants from Hong Kong
Family Households
Exceptional
66.5%
Exceptional
66.1%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
29.0%
Good
27.5%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.9%
Exceptional
49.6%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.46
Excellent
3.26
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
1.8%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.9%
Exceptional
4.8%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.2%
Exceptional
48.9%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
10.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
39.9%
Exceptional
23.6%

Apache vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Apache and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 13.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.2% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 10.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.1% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 0.42%), no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 2.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.1% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 4.7%).
Apache vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricApacheImmigrants from Hong Kong
No Vehicles Available
Poor
11.0%
Tragic
11.3%
1+ Vehicles Available
Poor
89.1%
Tragic
88.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Fair
55.1%
Tragic
52.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.2%
Fair
19.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.4%
Good
6.5%

Apache vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Apache and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.0% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 86.5%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 80.8%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 79.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (94.3% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.22%), 10th grade (92.6% compared to 93.1%, a difference of 0.53%), and 8th grade (95.5% compared to 94.9%, a difference of 0.67%).
Apache vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Education Level
Education Level MetricApacheImmigrants from Hong Kong
No Schooling Completed
Average
2.1%
Tragic
2.7%
Nursery School
Good
98.1%
Tragic
97.4%
Kindergarten
Good
98.0%
Tragic
97.3%
1st Grade
Good
98.0%
Tragic
97.3%
2nd Grade
Good
97.9%
Tragic
97.2%
3rd Grade
Good
97.8%
Tragic
97.1%
4th Grade
Good
97.6%
Tragic
96.9%
5th Grade
Average
97.4%
Tragic
96.7%
6th Grade
Average
97.1%
Tragic
96.3%
7th Grade
Fair
95.9%
Tragic
95.2%
8th Grade
Poor
95.5%
Tragic
94.9%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.3%
Tragic
94.1%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.6%
Tragic
93.1%
11th Grade
Tragic
90.4%
Fair
92.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
87.3%
Good
91.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
85.1%
Average
89.3%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
80.7%
Exceptional
86.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
58.0%
Exceptional
71.0%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
51.8%
Exceptional
66.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
36.2%
Exceptional
55.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
28.3%
Exceptional
48.2%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.0%
Exceptional
20.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.5%
Exceptional
6.4%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.8%

Apache vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Apache and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.0% compared to 0.95%, a difference of 114.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 82.2%), and vision disability (3.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 65.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 12.7%), disability age over 75 (53.6% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 15.3%), and cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 16.3%).
Apache vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Disability
Disability MetricApacheImmigrants from Hong Kong
Disability
Tragic
13.9%
Exceptional
10.0%
Males
Tragic
14.0%
Exceptional
9.4%
Females
Tragic
13.7%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
2.0%
Exceptional
0.95%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.4%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
14.9%
Exceptional
8.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
29.7%
Exceptional
19.9%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
53.6%
Exceptional
46.5%
Vision
Tragic
3.0%
Exceptional
1.8%
Hearing
Tragic
4.1%
Exceptional
2.7%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.6%
Exceptional
16.0%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.4%
Exceptional
5.3%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
2.4%