Hispanic or Latino vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,955,264 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong within Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.556. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hispanics or Latinos within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Immigrants from Hong Kong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hispanics or Latinos corresponds to a decrease of 1.8 Immigrants from Hong Kong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,515 compared to $128,140, a difference of 59.2%), per capita income ($35,688 compared to $56,709, a difference of 58.9%), and median family income ($85,647 compared to $131,067, a difference of 53.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.9% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 2.6%), householder income under 25 years ($50,279 compared to $62,083, a difference of 23.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($52,832 compared to $71,567, a difference of 35.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.7% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 74.9%), receiving food stamps (15.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 74.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (20.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 71.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.5% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 17.4%), single father poverty (16.8% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 17.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.8% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 22.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 56.3%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 40.8%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 38.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.5%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.7% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 2.8%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.5% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 13.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.1% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.6% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 63.6%), births to unmarried women (37.8% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 60.2%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 53.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (67.4% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 1.9%), average family size (3.41 compared to 3.26, a difference of 4.5%), and family households with children (29.9% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 24.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 17.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.4% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.9% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 10.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.4% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 16.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 111.0%), professional degree (3.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 102.2%), and master's degree (10.9% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 87.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.0% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.36%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.36%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 49.5%), vision disability (2.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 43.6%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 0.95%, a difference of 38.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (50.6% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 8.8%), cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 11.7%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 12.5%).