Aleut vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Community Comparison

COMPARE

Aleut
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Aleuts

Immigrants from Hong Kong

Fair
Good
3,609
SOCIAL INDEX
33.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
216th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,848
SOCIAL INDEX
76.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
102nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Hong Kong Integration in Aleut Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 51,219,817 people shows a perfect negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong within Aleut communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.975. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Aleuts within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.065% in Immigrants from Hong Kong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Aleuts corresponds to a decrease of 65.4 Immigrants from Hong Kong.
Aleut Integration in Immigrants from Hong Kong Communities

Aleut vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Aleut and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,370 compared to $128,140, a difference of 40.2%), median male earnings ($51,168 compared to $70,146, a difference of 37.1%), and per capita income ($42,210 compared to $56,709, a difference of 34.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (23.7% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 7.5%), householder income over 65 years ($62,708 compared to $71,567, a difference of 14.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($50,377 compared to $62,083, a difference of 23.2%).
Aleut vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Income
Income MetricAleutImmigrants from Hong Kong
Per Capita Income
Poor
$42,210
Exceptional
$56,709
Median Family Income
Poor
$98,702
Exceptional
$131,067
Median Household Income
Fair
$83,446
Exceptional
$111,519
Median Earnings
Tragic
$44,241
Exceptional
$59,433
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$51,168
Exceptional
$70,146
Median Female Earnings
Poor
$38,719
Exceptional
$49,818
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,377
Exceptional
$62,083
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Poor
$91,370
Exceptional
$128,140
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Average
$100,052
Exceptional
$127,500
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Excellent
$62,708
Exceptional
$71,567
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
23.7%
Good
25.5%

Aleut vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Aleut and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (20.3% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 63.0%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 55.2%), and single female poverty (25.4% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 53.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.63%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 7.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.5% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 11.7%).
Aleut vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Poverty
Poverty MetricAleutImmigrants from Hong Kong
Poverty
Fair
12.5%
Exceptional
10.4%
Families
Poor
9.5%
Exceptional
7.3%
Males
Poor
11.8%
Exceptional
9.6%
Females
Average
13.4%
Exceptional
11.2%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.9%
Exceptional
17.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
10.4%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
20.3%
Exceptional
12.4%
Children Under 16 years
Poor
17.1%
Exceptional
12.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
17.7%
Exceptional
12.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Fair
16.9%
Exceptional
12.3%
Single Males
Tragic
15.4%
Exceptional
10.4%
Single Females
Tragic
25.4%
Exceptional
16.5%
Single Fathers
Fair
16.4%
Exceptional
14.2%
Single Mothers
Tragic
32.9%
Exceptional
24.4%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.3%
Fair
11.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.5%
Tragic
12.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Poor
12.4%
Exceptional
9.1%

Aleut vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Aleut and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (9.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 54.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 40.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.3% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 34.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 8.0%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 12.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 15.3%).
Aleut vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Unemployment
Unemployment MetricAleutImmigrants from Hong Kong
Unemployment
Tragic
6.1%
Good
5.2%
Males
Tragic
6.8%
Good
5.2%
Females
Tragic
5.5%
Excellent
5.1%
Youth < 25
Tragic
14.1%
Average
11.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
21.2%
Good
17.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
13.8%
Poor
10.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
9.7%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.3%
Average
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
6.8%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.9%
Excellent
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.0%
Good
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.3%
Exceptional
7.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Good
7.5%
Exceptional
5.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.6%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Average
5.4%
Exceptional
4.7%

Aleut vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Aleut and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 32.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (79.0% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 10.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.42%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.92%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.4% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.9%).
Aleut vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricAleutImmigrants from Hong Kong
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.0%
Exceptional
65.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.2%
Exceptional
80.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.4%
Tragic
30.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
79.0%
Tragic
71.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.4%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.6%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Average
84.4%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.0%
Exceptional
83.6%

Aleut vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Aleut and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (39.3% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 66.9%), single father households (3.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 66.2%), and single mother households (6.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 41.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 0.41%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.26, a difference of 0.86%), and family households (63.4% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 4.3%).
Aleut vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Family Structure
Family Structure MetricAleutImmigrants from Hong Kong
Family Households
Tragic
63.4%
Exceptional
66.1%
Family Households with Children
Average
27.4%
Good
27.5%
Married-couple Households
Poor
45.6%
Exceptional
49.6%
Average Family Size
Average
3.23
Excellent
3.26
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.0%
Exceptional
1.8%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
6.8%
Exceptional
4.8%
Currently Married
Average
46.7%
Exceptional
48.9%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
10.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
39.3%
Exceptional
23.6%

Aleut vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Aleut and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.0% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 15.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 6.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.5% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 1.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 2.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 5.3%).
Aleut vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricAleutImmigrants from Hong Kong
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
13.0%
Tragic
11.3%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
87.5%
Tragic
88.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
54.1%
Tragic
52.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
20.2%
Fair
19.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.9%
Good
6.5%

Aleut vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Aleut and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 88.6%), professional degree (3.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 77.2%), and master's degree (11.8% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 73.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.1% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 0.83%), high school diploma (90.4% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and nursery school (98.7% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.3%).
Aleut vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Education Level
Education Level MetricAleutImmigrants from Hong Kong
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Tragic
2.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.7%
Tragic
97.4%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.6%
Tragic
97.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Tragic
97.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Tragic
97.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
96.7%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Tragic
96.3%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Tragic
95.2%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.9%
Tragic
94.9%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.0%
Tragic
94.1%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.0%
Tragic
93.1%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.7%
Fair
92.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.1%
Good
91.3%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.4%
Average
89.3%
GED/Equivalency
Average
85.6%
Exceptional
86.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.2%
Exceptional
71.0%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.4%
Exceptional
66.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
39.6%
Exceptional
55.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
31.3%
Exceptional
48.2%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.8%
Exceptional
20.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.6%
Exceptional
6.4%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.8%

Aleut vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Aleut and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 68.7%), hearing disability (4.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 60.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 55.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 6.2%), disability age over 75 (50.6% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 8.8%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 17.3%).
Aleut vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Disability
Disability MetricAleutImmigrants from Hong Kong
Disability
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
10.0%
Males
Tragic
13.5%
Exceptional
9.4%
Females
Tragic
12.7%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.2%
Exceptional
0.95%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.1%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.8%
Exceptional
8.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
28.4%
Exceptional
19.9%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
50.6%
Exceptional
46.5%
Vision
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
1.8%
Hearing
Tragic
4.3%
Exceptional
2.7%
Cognitive
Excellent
17.0%
Exceptional
16.0%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
5.3%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
2.4%