British West Indian vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 110,603,582 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong within British West Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.137. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in British West Indians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.011% in Immigrants from Hong Kong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 British West Indians corresponds to a decrease of 10.8 Immigrants from Hong Kong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($85,565 compared to $128,140, a difference of 49.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,571 compared to $127,500, a difference of 49.0%), and median household income ($75,647 compared to $111,519, a difference of 47.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,844 compared to $62,083, a difference of 19.8%), median female earnings ($40,299 compared to $49,818, a difference of 23.6%), and median earnings ($44,552 compared to $59,433, a difference of 33.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (17.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 96.8%), child poverty among boys under 16 (21.6% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 76.1%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (21.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 75.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.2% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 21.4%), single father poverty (17.7% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 24.0%), and single male poverty (13.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 27.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 43.8%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 41.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 39.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 1.6%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 5.3%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (29.1% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 4.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.2% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.4% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.4% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 73.4%), births to unmarried women (38.0% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 61.2%), and married-couple households (38.3% compared to 49.6%, a difference of 29.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.32 compared to 3.26, a difference of 1.9%), family households (62.8% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 5.4%), and family households with children (26.0% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (29.7% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 163.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 87.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 67.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (70.4% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 26.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (35.4% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 48.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 67.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 90.4%), professional degree (3.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 68.0%), and master's degree (13.8% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 48.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.3% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.060%), 1st grade (97.2% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.060%), and kindergarten (97.3% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.070%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 45.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 35.0%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 31.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (0.99% compared to 0.95%, a difference of 4.6%), disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 4.8%), and hearing disability (2.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 9.5%).