Immigrants from Lebanon vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 165,110,642 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong within Immigrant from Lebanon communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.374. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Lebanon within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.030% in Immigrants from Hong Kong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Lebanon corresponds to a decrease of 30.4 Immigrants from Hong Kong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($101,124 compared to $128,140, a difference of 26.7%), householder income under 25 years ($50,729 compared to $62,083, a difference of 22.4%), and median household income ($91,887 compared to $111,519, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.5% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 7.9%), householder income over 65 years ($64,521 compared to $71,567, a difference of 10.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($108,471 compared to $127,500, a difference of 17.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (17.0% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 39.0%), child poverty under the age of 5 (17.3% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 39.0%), and married-couple family poverty (6.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 39.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.17%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 13.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 36.7%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 23.7%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.25%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.9% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.2% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 15.6%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.7% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.9% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.5% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.4% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 13.7%), divorced or separated (11.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 11.4%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.5% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 0.94%), average family size (3.30 compared to 3.26, a difference of 1.1%), and currently married (48.2% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 34.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 8.9%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.6% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 2.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.8% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 3.2%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.6% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 23.6%), professional degree (5.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 17.3%), and no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (86.8% compared to 86.9%, a difference of 0.21%), 12th grade, no diploma (91.6% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 0.25%), and high school diploma (89.5% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 25.0%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 0.95%, a difference of 22.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.6% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 2.5%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 4.7%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 5.6%).