Immigrants from Malaysia vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 156,227,234 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong within Immigrant from Malaysia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.258. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Malaysia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.292% in Immigrants from Hong Kong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Malaysia corresponds to an increase of 291.5 Immigrants from Hong Kong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($107,650 compared to $128,140, a difference of 19.0%), median household income ($96,292 compared to $111,519, a difference of 15.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,179 compared to $62,083, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 3.0%), householder income over 65 years ($65,497 compared to $71,567, a difference of 9.3%), and median male earnings ($62,121 compared to $70,146, a difference of 12.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.6% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 25.5%), child poverty among boys under 16 (15.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 24.6%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 1.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.3% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 4.2%), and single father poverty (15.2% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 13.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 10.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.020%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.75%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.77%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.3% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 12.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.3% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 0.84%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 0.44%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.51%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 17.0%), births to unmarried women (27.4% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 16.1%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.22 compared to 3.26, a difference of 1.1%), family households with children (27.9% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and family households (64.0% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 20.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 9.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.3% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (52.7% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 0.21%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.5% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 2.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.3% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 15.5%), professional degree (5.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 12.2%), and doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (91.3% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 0.080%), high school diploma (89.3% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.080%), and 11th grade (92.4% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 0.17%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 18.9%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 0.95%, a difference of 15.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.0% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.4% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 0.14%), ambulatory disability (5.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.6%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 2.9%).