French American Indian vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 94,086,036 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong within French American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.430. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French American Indians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.046% in Immigrants from Hong Kong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French American Indians corresponds to a decrease of 46.4 Immigrants from Hong Kong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($85,899 compared to $128,140, a difference of 49.2%), median household income ($76,387 compared to $111,519, a difference of 46.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($89,811 compared to $127,500, a difference of 42.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.4% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 0.66%), householder income under 25 years ($48,977 compared to $62,083, a difference of 26.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,699 compared to $71,567, a difference of 30.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (20.8% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 67.7%), child poverty among boys under 16 (19.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 56.8%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (19.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 55.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 0.15%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 3.9%), and married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 15.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 59.0%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 31.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 29.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.15%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.37%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.8% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 30.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.8% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 7.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.8% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.2% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.6% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 55.3%), single mother households (6.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 42.1%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 40.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.26, a difference of 2.0%), family households with children (26.6% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 3.6%), and family households (62.4% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 8.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.5% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 5.6%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 1.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 5.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 75.8%), professional degree (3.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 70.5%), and master's degree (12.7% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 60.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 0.090%), high school diploma (88.7% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.62%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.68%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 67.2%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 56.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.6% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 52.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.3% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 4.0%), cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 11.7%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 13.6%).